I admit that I let this slide, but it does seem a very useful
concept for 1.3 :) :)
+1 as well.
At 6:04 PM -0500 11/29/01, Bill Stoddard wrote:
It's kinda crufty, but so are a lot of other things in 1.3. It is a small patch which
is
goodness and I appreciate what it is used for.
If it is
: Request for Patch to 1.3.x
Does anyone have any objections to adding this capability??
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kevin Mallory
Subject: Re: Request for Patch to 1.3.x
On Wed
Mallory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Greg Stein' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: Request for Patch to 1.3.x
Does anyone have any objections to adding this capability??
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:19:34AM -0700, Kevin Mallory wrote:
...
[ patch allows custom caching mechanisms ]
...
The patch simply adds a new callback (the 'filter callback') into the
handling in buff.c's routine writev_it_all() and buff_write().
When not registered, there is no
