Serf, WAS: Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r378032 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2006-02-21 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Serf's mailing list is at: http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/serf-dev/ (You'll find some familiar faces posting there. *duck*) Thanks for the hints. I see it is a low traffic mailing list :-). I hope to find time to have a look into

Serf, WAS: Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r378032 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2006-02-20 Thread Sander Striker
Plüm wrote: I think the SSL problem is caused by throwing away the conn_rec entry for the backend and create a new one for each request. That does not sound right, but I admit that keeping it must be carefully examinated due to several possible issues. Two that I can see immeditately are:

Re: Serf, WAS: Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r378032 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2006-02-20 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 2/20/06, Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For me that puts the question on the table if using fake request_rec and conn_rec structures for the backend connections is really a good idea. This misuse already leads to problems in other areas. But reworking this will take much time