Re: Time for 2.4.24!

2016-12-04 Thread Greg Ames
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:06 AM Eric Covener wrote: > Trying to look at the event stuff and the strict stuff. > > If any more experienced event folks are lurking, help on the review > would be great (And thanks to sf!) > This lurker isn't up to doing a full on line-by-line

Re: Time for 2.4.24!

2016-12-02 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > hello? hello? Anyone there? :) > > > On Nov 21, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > We have a few items in STATUS that, imo, should be tested, voted-on > > and the committed to the httpd-2.4

Re: Time for 2.4.24!

2016-12-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > Trying to look at the event stuff and the strict stuff. > > If any more experienced event folks are lurking, help on the review > would be great (And thanks to sf!) > I found the PR itself to be full of useful data for

Re: Time for 2.4.24!

2016-12-01 Thread Eric Covener
Trying to look at the event stuff and the strict stuff. If any more experienced event folks are lurking, help on the review would be great (And thanks to sf!) On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > hello? hello? Anyone there? :) > >> On Nov 21, 2016, at 7:47

Re: Time for 2.4.24!

2016-12-01 Thread Stefan Eissing
Don't look at me! Have my hands full with h2 stuff... ;-) > Am 01.12.2016 um 15:28 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > hello? hello? Anyone there? :) > >> On Nov 21, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> We have a few items in STATUS that, imo, should be

Time for 2.4.24!

2016-11-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
We have a few items in STATUS that, imo, should be tested, voted-on and the committed to the httpd-2.4 branch in anticipation of a new release SOON! I'd like to have a T the end of next week, if possible so we can start off December (or be close to "starting it off") with a new release for the