Re: Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-19 Thread Steffen
In the branches/2.4/CHANGES  there are three entries of mod_md, and one is labeled 2.2.3. Looks better to me just make one combined entry,  version number not needed. Now we have the latest mod_md v2.2.7 in branches : Building/Running/Testing all fine. On 12-2-2020 11:17, Steffen wrote:

Re: Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-12 Thread Steffen
Like to see that mod_md gets a newer version. Running/tested already 2.2.6 (trunk now 2.2.4 and branches 2.2.3) Propose that it is time that mod_md becomes Stable. I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. On 11-2-2020 15:12, Jim Ja

Re: Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 2020-02-11 09:12, Jim Jagielski wrote: Seems like a good time to propose a release... I can RM if desired. A beta release tarball would be wonderful and then I can start test builds and see what shakes loose on the older C99 strict systems. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX

Re: Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-11 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Jim, Il giorno mar 11 feb 2020 alle ore 15:13 Jim Jagielski ha scritto: > > Seems like a good time to propose a release... I can RM if desired. Daniel proposed the same thing a couple of days ago, I'd suggest to keep only one thread open and +1 in there :) Luca

Re: Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-11 Thread Steffen
+1 Good plan. Steffen >> Op 11 feb. 2020 om 15:13 heeft Jim Jagielski het volgende >> geschreven: > Seems like a good time to propose a release... I can RM if desired.

Time for 2.4.42?

2020-02-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Seems like a good time to propose a release... I can RM if desired.