I propose a release somewhere around the 4th of July,
to celebrate our independence from proprietary s/w!
I'll RM.
Am 24.06.2013 20:16, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I propose a release somewhere around the 4th of July,
to celebrate our independence from proprietary s/w!
I'll RM
a snapshot for testers at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
would be fine, it would take me 5 minutes to rebuild
our RPM from it and
That is true actually, new test system - will need to look at why 2.4.4
stumbled over that, while 2.4.x did not.
Many thanks for the feedback.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
consider
consider this a curiosity - but using the same configure command for 2.4.4
and 2.4.x - with 2.4.x the filter mod_deflate.c gets included in libexec in
version 2.4.4, but not in 2.4.x
Is this expected? the mod_deflate.so is no longer included (by default)?
using:
./configure \
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
consider this a curiosity - but using the same configure command for 2.4.4
and 2.4.x - with 2.4.x the filter mod_deflate.c gets included in libexec in
version 2.4.4, but not in 2.4.x
Is this expected? the mod_deflate.so is
I have meanwhile all the compiler warnings reduced down to one:
.\lua_request.c(574) : warning C4244: 'return' : conversion from
'apr_off_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
Nice work! :)
On Jun 3, 2013 11:11 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have meanwhile all the compiler warnings reduced down to one:
.\lua_request.c(574) : warning C4244: 'return' : conversion from
'apr_off_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
Nice work! :)
On 25.05.2013 05:46, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Found another small docu bug:
r:unescape(string) -- Unescapes an URL-escaped string:
local url = http%3a%2f%2ffoo.bar%2f1+2+3+%26+4+%2b+5
local unescaped = r:escape(url) -- returns 'http://foo.bar/1 2 3 4 + 5'
the function call should here be
Can some of the proposed backports lacking a single
vote get sum luv?
Hi Daniel,
On 25.05.2013 05:46, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 25.05.2013 02:06, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 24.05.2013 23:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
That's fine by me, I'm not married to 'sleep' (although I do like a good
nap)
hehe, ok; I look into it soon.
done.
Found another small docu bug:
On May 24, 2013, at 4:22 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:20:03 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:20:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even more fun stuff in STATUS.
Let me again ask for backports of r1368121, r1388447 and r1389339
On 28 May 2013, at 3:33 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson sgunder...@bigfoot.com
wrote:
Let me again ask for backports of r1368121, r1388447 and r1389339
from trunk; they are required to build mpm-itk without patching Apache.
Proposed.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:14:55PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Let me again ask for backports of r1368121, r1388447 and r1389339
from trunk; they are required to build mpm-itk without patching Apache.
Proposed.
Thanks!
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
+ is not used in url-encoding. + is used in
application/x-www-form-urlencoded encoding. So I assume this function has
implemented unescaping application/x-www-form-urlencoded. For regular
URL-encoding, space is encoded as %20.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
o Performance-related patches (Event mod_ssl, cache, etc)
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
Could you provide some notes for testing wstunnel in a
On 24.05.2013 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
ok, after spending a bunch of hours during last weeks with testing
mod_lua mainly on Windows I've finally removed my blocking vote
On Fri, 24 May 2013 21:02:04 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
also given that currently only Daniel and I (and Gregg with some
testing) care about mod_lua I would like that we make an exception
for this module so that we can backport any further modifications and
fixes directly
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:20:03 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even more fun stuff in STATUS.
I'll RM.
What is your thought on RSN? Sometime
On 24 May 2013, at 2:40 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
o Performance-related patches (Event mod_ssl, cache, etc)
On 24.05.2013 22:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
There are several others of us, but large patch sets are difficult
to incorporate in our day-to-day build trees. What about a sandbox
of all of the proposed deltas, either just the modules/lua/ branch
or the entire tree if that isn't realistic.
On 05/24/2013 09:02 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 24.05.2013 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
ok, after spending a bunch of hours during last weeks with testing
mod_lua mainly
Hi Daniel,
On 24.05.2013 23:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
I can only say +1 from me, we need consistency here :)
great!
That's fine by me, I'm not married to 'sleep' (although I do like a good
nap)
hehe, ok; I look into it soon.
Optional: I really would like to also have DBM support in addition
Hi Daniel,
On 25.05.2013 02:06, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 24.05.2013 23:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
That's fine by me, I'm not married to 'sleep' (although I do like a good
nap)
hehe, ok; I look into it soon.
done.
Found another small docu bug:
r:unescape(string) -- Unescapes an URL-escaped
On 5/24/2013 2:03 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
ATM I think this is not needed - from what I tested during past weeks
the current trunk code is at least as good / bad as what is already in
2.4.x branch - so copying over trunk to 2.4.x seems an improvement to
me due to various bug fixes beside the
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even more fun stuff in STATUS.
I'll RM.
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:20:03 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even more fun stuff in STATUS.
I'll RM.
+1 and once this head-cold is clear, I'm now
28 matches
Mail list logo
