Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-25 Thread Paul Querna
httpd side: serf to me is the wrong question. http/2.0 in the simplest implementation is just another protocol to httpd. We have the constructs to handle it, kinda. Improvements to async support in various bits will help. However our constructs about requests and connections (and their pools)

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-25 Thread Paul Querna
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: APR: Considering that before we know it, http/2.0 will be here, and ignoring httpd for the time being, what features/additions do we see as being needed to support http/2.0 from an APR library level? How do we compare w/

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-25 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:26:38 -0700 Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: APR: Considering that before we know it, http/2.0 will be here, and ignoring httpd for the time being, what features/additions do we see as being

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-25 Thread Graham Leggett
On 25 Sep 2014, at 2:13 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: http/2.0 in the simplest implementation is just another protocol to httpd. We have the constructs to handle it, kinda. Improvements to async support in various bits will help. However our constructs about requests and

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: HTTPD: From the httpd point of view, what does serf provide for us to help us get to http/2.0? How about a new mod_proxy_http2 which can go async like in mod_proxy_wstunnel (trunk)? Some code could then be moved to

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-24 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: HTTPD: From the httpd point of view, what does serf provide for us to help us get to http/2.0? How about a new mod_proxy_http2 which can go async

Re: What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-24 Thread Graham Leggett
On 23 Sep 2014, at 9:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: APR: Considering that before we know it, http/2.0 will be here, and ignoring httpd for the time being, what features/additions do we see as being needed to support http/2.0 from an APR library level? How do we compare w/

What's need for http/2.0?

2014-09-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
APR: Considering that before we know it, http/2.0 will be here, and ignoring httpd for the time being, what features/additions do we see as being needed to support http/2.0 from an APR library level? How do we compare w/ libuv, for example? How event-aware should APR be, ala libevent? HTTPD: From