On 10/23/2018 03:52 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:18 PM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Yann Ylavic
>>>
>>> I tried to implement that in the attached patch, WDYT?
>>
>> 1. Why removing the META_BUCKET check when
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:52 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Yeah, I have a version which checks only for
> (APR_BUCKET_IS_FLUSH(bucket) || cumulative_tmp_bb_len >=
> ap_get_core_module_config()->flush_max_threshold)
See attached.
Index: server/request.c
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:18 PM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Yann Ylavic
> >
> > I tried to implement that in the attached patch, WDYT?
>
> 1. Why removing the META_BUCKET check when reading buckets of length -1? I
> don't see any sense
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2018 13:09
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: ap_request_core_filter issues
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:52 PM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:51
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:52 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Curiously inefficient writev use when stracing the process, though,
> > >>> dunno what's going on there (trunk/prefork):
> > >>>
> > >>> writev(46,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Curiously inefficient writev use when stracing the process, though,
> >>> dunno what's going on there (trunk/prefork):
> >>>
> >>> writev(46, [{iov_base="\r\n", iov_len=2}], 1) = 2
> >>> writev(46, [{iov_base="1f84\r\n",
