On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:26:02AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:00:44PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > > Does that make any sense? I'm certain you will have users misconfigure
> > > > the 'backstop' modules (_default flavors)
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:19:53 -0700
>From: Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: auth stuff still broken
>
>
>But since our running of auth hooks comes from server/, then this stuff
>could prolly go there as well. IMO, it suck
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:26:02 -0700
>From: Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: auth stuff still broken
>
>
>+1 for the core, or at least a module that's always statically compiled
>(which is easy to do with the .m4 macros
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:26:02AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:00:44PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > Does that make any sense? I'm certain you will have users misconfigure
> > > the 'backstop' modules (_default flavors) resulting in insecure servers.
> > > If the 'ba
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:00:44PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Does that make any sense? I'm certain you will have users misconfigure
> > the 'backstop' modules (_default flavors) resulting in insecure servers.
> > If the 'backstop' _default auth handlers are always loaded as part of the
> > cor
At 12:04 PM 9/17/2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:00:44 -0700, rbb wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >> Mod_auth would further include all of the hooks, and be the common
> >> module that all other mod_auth_foo, authn and authz modules require.
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:50:56AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I was thinking about this. What about -eliminating- the mod_authn_default
> and mod_authz_default, merging them into mod_auth, and moving the
> directives from mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_digest into the common
> mod_auth.
R
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:00:44 -0700, rbb wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> I was thinking about this. What about -eliminating- the
>> mod_authn_default and mod_authz_default, merging them into mod_auth, and
>> moving the directives from mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_di
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I was thinking about this. What about -eliminating- the mod_authn_default
> and mod_authz_default, merging them into mod_auth, and moving the
> directives from mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_digest into the common
> mod_auth.
>
> Mod_auth would fu
I was thinking about this. What about -eliminating- the mod_authn_default
and mod_authz_default, merging them into mod_auth, and moving the
directives from mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_digest into the common
mod_auth.
Mod_auth would further include all of the hooks, and be the common
module that
a fresh build/install of .42-dev:
Cannot load
/.../modules/mod_authn_file.so into server:
/.../modules/mod_authn_file.so:
undefined symbol: authn_register_provider
stock httpd.conf is installed (by 'make install') with modules in this
order:
LoadModule authn_file_module modules/mod_authn_file
11 matches
Mail list logo