Re: dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... any feedback on this? the original patch is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=108693011011443w=2 --Geoff ok, here's a first pass at just a small part - achieve the hook listing by offering an apr_table_do()-esque iterator just for hooks. the output of

Re: dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-18 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: any feedback on this? the original patch is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-devm=108693011011443w=2 Sorry, had forgotten to go back and review. I'm forwarding it to my at-work email addr (which doesn't have 59,000 msgs in the

Re: dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-10 Thread Geoffrey Young
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: I wanted to ping everyone about an idea I've been throwing around for a few months now. I'd like the ability to shuffle the declared hook ordering around, most likely during the post-config phase. There was some discussion

dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all I wanted to ping everyone about an idea I've been throwing around for a few months now. I'd like the ability to shuffle the declared hook ordering around, most likely during the post-config phase. basically what I would like to be able to do is shift a hook from one place (say,

Re: dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: I wanted to ping everyone about an idea I've been throwing around for a few months now. I'd like the ability to shuffle the declared hook ordering around, most likely during the post-config phase. There was some discussion about this or something at

Re: dynamic hook ordering

2004-06-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: I wanted to ping everyone about an idea I've been throwing around for a few months now. I'd like the ability to shuffle the declared hook ordering around, most likely during the post-config phase. There was some discussion