Re: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-31 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 01:03:28PM -0500, Dale Ghent wrote: > > 2) Quite a while ago, Martin committed PNG format analogs of the GIFs in > the icons directory. Was the original plan to move from the GIF format to > PNG for these? Should I include a patch for httpd.conf to do this, as > well? Quit

RE: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Joshua Slive
> From: Dale Ghent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > What I'm more-or-less referring to are the Language-related stuff and > containers (as well as bringing up some of the more informative > comments and such from 1.3.) > > Apache 2.0's httpd.conf is based off of 1.3.9's, and there have been a few

Re: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Dale Ghent
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Eli Marmor wrote: | Dale Ghent wrote: | | > Hey, I have two questions here: | > | > 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x | > httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need | > for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does t

Re: httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Eli Marmor
Dale Ghent wrote: > Hey, I have two questions here: > > 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x > httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need > for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does this. httpd.conf of 2.0 is not backward compatible w

httpd.conf Qs

2001-12-30 Thread Dale Ghent
Hey, I have two questions here: 1) I'm working on making sure that directives in the Apache 1.3.x httpd.conf are sync'd to the 2.0 httpd.conf. Can anyone confirm a need for this? If so, I'll send a patch that does this. 2) Quite a while ago, Martin committed PNG format analogs of the GIFs in t