Re: looking for luv

2013-06-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to actually address his concerns by actually working on the code instead of just blocking it for whatever reason. On Jun 13, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Graham Leggett

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to actually address his concerns by actually working on the code instead of just blocking it for whatever reason. Wow! Stefan raised a number of issues in STATUS

RE: looking for luv

2013-06-18 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
From: Jeff Trawick Sent: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013 15:32 To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Subject: Re: looking for luv On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to actually address his concerns

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 18, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to actually address his concerns by actually working on the code instead of just blocking it for

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-18 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to actually address his concerns by actually working on the code instead of just blocking it for whatever reason. That's not what I intended. I did not vote -1. The comments were meant to

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-13 Thread Graham Leggett
On 12 Jun 2013, at 20:08, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than register_timed_callback, and there doesn't seem to be any user of register_timed_callback besides mod_dialup.c. Is mod_dialup really that important? And is the

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: I am interested in reviewing it, but have some other work to finish first. Thx. BTW, a reminder that it's based on Theo's code from mod_log_spread et.al.

looking for luv

2013-06-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv * mod_proxy_wstunnel: Backport (copy) websocket tunnel proxy submodule * skiplist: Add skiplist functionality

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: 2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv * skiplist: Add skiplist functionality There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than register_timed_callback, and there doesn't seem to be any user of register_timed_callback besides

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: 2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv * skiplist: Add skiplist functionality There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than register_timed_callback

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:55:15 -0400 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: 2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv * skiplist: Add skiplist functionality There doesn't

Re: looking for luv

2013-06-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:24 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: My question is not whether that feature is useful, rather whether this belongs in httpd, or is a better candidate for apr? Either is fine, I guess. However, my plan is that the eventopt stuff will eventually get