- Original Message -
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: make certificate Doesn't Work, Apache 2.0.28, Unix, and mod_ssl (fwd)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Acked. Did we decide what we're going to do about this? Or is it just
waiting on somebody to do it?
I think wrowe and I were of the mind that we shouldn't have any
dummy
, 2001 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: make certificate Doesn't Work, Apache 2.0.28, Unix, and
mod_ssl (fwd)
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Acked. Did we decide what we're going to do about
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:18:13PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Okay, sorry, I was confused. I didn't realize make certificate was the
Snake Oil thing... I thought it was the script to generate a private key
and a real CSR.
I'm not exactly sure what make certificate is in this context. =)
Acked. Did we decide what we're going to do about this? Or is it just
waiting on somebody to do it?
--Cliff
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:35:49 -0800
From: Kevin McQuiggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: make
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Acked. Did we decide what we're going to do about this? Or is it just
waiting on somebody to do it?
I think wrowe and I were of the mind that we shouldn't have any
dummy certificates or any automated process to create a
