William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/29/2012 6:25 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
If this looks OK, I'd love to commit and move on to the next
patch ... assuming I can keep paddling near the shore and avoid those
dangerous undertows! Thanks and cheers,
Looks sensible to me.
Thanks, Bill --
On 6/29/2012 6:25 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
If this looks OK, I'd love to commit and move on to the next
patch ... assuming I can keep paddling near the shore and avoid those
dangerous undertows! Thanks and cheers,
Looks sensible to me.
Hi --
After many years sailing far away from httpd shores, I happen to be
making a visit again and might have a trickle of mod_fcgid patches
to share. Because it's been a while I thought I'd post the first
one or two for RTC instead of just committing them directly.
This one is just adding
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris, I'm really confused. Are you asking to branch httpd trunk into
a 2.4 branch (bad, we aren't there) or a 2.3 branch (overkill IMHO, if
we don't have cycles to get to 2.4/3.0 with what's in trunk, we certainly
don't have cycles to make the determinations of
Chris Darroch wrote:
* use the httpd/mod_fcgid subtree for bug fix releases of mod_fcgid
(retain compatibility with httpd 2.0/2.2 as well as
existing mod_fcgid configurations)
I see where you're going with this, and I like it. It means
that for the time being, we just ignore the
Chris Darroch wrote:
I see where you're going with this, and I like it. It means
that for the time being, we just ignore the incomplete autoconf/build
stuff in mod_fcgid's sandbox.
FWIW, httpd/mod_ftp/ has a build schema that can literally be dropped
on top of an httpd source tree, or run
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.comwrote:
Hi --
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Many people use mod_fcgid on Apache 2.0/2.2. The message should be that
mod_fcgid development has moved to the ASF, and existing users are not being
left behind in the transition. So a
Hi --
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Many people use mod_fcgid on Apache 2.0/2.2. The message should be that
mod_fcgid development has moved to the ASF, and existing users are not
being left behind in the transition. So a branch for mod_fcgid 2.x is
maintained for httpd 2.0/2.2 users just as our own
Chris Darroch wrote:
It's also worth assuming, I think, that mod_fcgid isn't going
to be back-ported and included in the 2.2.x distribution anytime soon.
Given that, I suppose we should look at continuing a 2.x branch
for mod_fcgid (with improved autoconf magic, obviously), at least
