Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-13 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Alternatively a different auth module could read and extra field that point the user to a different root directory. sjorge == /server/host/www.blackdot.be wrowe == /server/host/apache.org ... this way the user name would be free of @'s :) Downside would be: 1. multiple domains can't have the

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
You can do this today using FTPJailUser. Trying to take this one step deeper into the vhost concept and vhost specific permissions, though. Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Alternatively a different auth module could read and extra field that point the user to a different root directory. sjorge ==

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-13 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Oh didn't catch that i was scanning through the documentation with cat on a ssh session from a PDA when I wrote this. I'll look into this since that might be of use for me already then. On 4/13/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can do this today using FTPJailUser. Trying

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: fre 2007-04-06 klockan 21:37 +0100 skrev Nick Kew: What about modifying mod_ftp USER directive to accept username in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and tokenize user as the username, host as the http-ish Host: virtual host name? Sounds fair, provided the protocol

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
ons 2007-04-11 klockan 10:46 -0500 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.: Firefox is fine with... ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ but it's odd enough I wouldn't trust that to be consistently supported, and you raise a good point with proxy/firewalls. The above isn't a correctly formed

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: So if, for example, the admin wanted to define as the alternative separator, ftp://memyhost:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ would be a little less ambiguous to browser-style schemas. Sounds reasonable. Except that it's quite impractical to use in HTML coding and very many

mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I've given some thought to the desire for mod_ftp to support different host contexts, and came up with this... What about modifying mod_ftp USER directive to accept username in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and tokenize user as the username, host as the http-ish Host: virtual host name? If

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-06 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:25:03 -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've given some thought to the desire for mod_ftp to support different host contexts, and came up with this... What about modifying mod_ftp USER directive to accept username in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: mod_ftp named virtual hosts?

2007-04-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
fre 2007-04-06 klockan 21:37 +0100 skrev Nick Kew: What about modifying mod_ftp USER directive to accept username in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and tokenize user as the username, host as the http-ish Host: virtual host name? Sounds fair, provided the protocol doesn't assign some