Hi Christophe,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking at potential backport to synch and trunk, I arrived on
> r1619483.
>
> This is a follow up of r1619444 which is a follow up of r1619
Hi,
while looking at potential backport to synch and trunk, I arrived on
r1619483.
This is a follow up of r1619444 which is a follow up of r1619383.
These 2 have been bakcported (see r1669555)
So I was wondering if r1619483 should also have been backported at the
same time?
Best regards
