Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 1:25 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 5/22/25 3:29 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 5/22/25 2:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > >> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 9:39 AM jean-frederic clere > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 5/20/25 2:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 a

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/22/25 3:29 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 5/22/25 2:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 9:39 AM jean-frederic clere >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/20/25 2:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Find the c

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/22/25 2:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 9:39 AM jean-frederic clere wrote: On 5/20/25 2:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: Find the configuration I have used to reproduce the customer issue, thanks for all explanatio

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 9:39 AM jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 5/20/25 2:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM jean-frederic clere > > wrote: > >> > >> Find the configuration I have used to reproduce the customer issue, > >> thanks for all explanations for far ;-) > >

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/20/25 2:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: Find the configuration I have used to reproduce the customer issue, thanks for all explanations for far ;-) So regression is on vhost "host14.example.com" right? And not "fproxy.example.com"?

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:03 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Find the configuration I have used to reproduce the customer issue, > thanks for all explanations for far ;-) So regression is on vhost "host14.example.com" right? And not "fproxy.example.com"? Cheers; Yann.

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/19/25 9:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/19/25 8:13 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 7:42 PM Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/19/25 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/19/25 8:13 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 7:42 PM Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> >>> On 5/19/25 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > >> Am 19.05.

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 7:42 PM Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 5/19/25 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev > > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > >>

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 5/19/25 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev > > wrote: > >> > >>> Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > >>> > >>> > >>> Hm, r1912459 added this test to disable reuse for CONNEC

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/19/25 5:27 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: >> >>> Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >>> >>> >>> Hm, r1912459 added this test to disable reuse for CONNECT connections >>> to ProxyRemote, because I thought that CONNECT reque

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

> Am 19.05.2025 um 17:27 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: >> >>> Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >>> >>> >>> Hm, r1912459 added this test to disable reuse for CONNECT connections >>> to ProxyRemote, because I thought that

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > > > > > Hm, r1912459 added this test to disable reuse for CONNECT connections > > to ProxyRemote, because I thought that CONNECT requests were not > > reusable. > > Hmm, what kind o

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

> Am 19.05.2025 um 16:46 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/19/25 1:53 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While investigating a customer case I note a regression with forward proxy. >>> While testing I have: >>> 2.4

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 5/19/25 1:53 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While investigating a customer case I note a regression with forward proxy. > > While testing I have: > > 2.4.57 finished in 3.05s, 3278.62 req/s, 743.70KB/s > > 2.4.x fin

Re: regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

On 5/19/25 1:53 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > While investigating a customer case I note a regression with forward proxy. > While testing I have: > 2.4.57 finished in 3.05s, 3278.62 req/s, 743.70KB/s > 2.4.x  finished in 15.38s, 650.17 req/s, 147.88KB/s > > The regression goes way

regression with forward proxy due to Revision 1912459

Hi, While investigating a customer case I note a regression with forward proxy. While testing I have: 2.4.57 finished in 3.05s, 3278.62 req/s, 743.70KB/s 2.4.x finished in 15.38s, 650.17 req/s, 147.88KB/s The regression goes way with: +++ jfclere@fedora:~/httpd-2.4.x$ svn diff . Index: module