On 2/15/24 13:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/15/24 9:28 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted to the
On 2/15/24 9:28 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noted to the res
On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
+++
On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
>>> mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
>>> +++
>>> for (i
On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
+++
for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) {
(*worker)->s->lbs
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
> mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
> +++
> for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) {
> (*worker)->s->lbstatus = 0;
> ap_proxy_
Hi,
I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
+++
for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) {
(*worker)->s->lbstatus = 0;
ap_proxy_set_busy_count(*worker, 0); /* BAD */
}
+++
In fact reset() i
