Re: retire cvs modules (moved from PMC)

2003-09-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/ shows that we have a *lot* of repositories that are hard for newcomers to sort through (and consume quite a bit of space) - if we httpd'ers can help mop up - I'm sure our efforts are appreciated. For that reason, and just

Re: retire cvs modules (moved from PMC)

2003-09-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:30 AM 10/19/2003, Joshua Slive wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/ shows that we have a *lot* of repositories that are hard for newcomers to sort through (and consume quite a bit of space) - if we httpd'ers can help mop up - I'm sure our efforts

Re: retire cvs modules (moved from PMC)

2003-09-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
[Moved this thread from infrastructure/pmc] Hello dev@'ers and docs@'ers... the infrastructure team has been trying to mop up some very old repositories, and the only question is which should remain within our generally accessible CVS space, which should be collected into a new

Re: retire cvs modules (moved from PMC)

2003-09-18 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: apache-1.2, httpd-proxy My feeling is that *if* they move at all, they need to be publicly accessible from a graveyard repository. Are their objections to moving them? If we moved the rcs files from httpd-proxy directly to httpd-2.0/modules/proxy - there doesn't