On 04.12.2011 14:15, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links
to openssl (or any oth
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links to openssl
(or any other library), it's all abstracted away. m
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
> > I hope that other vendors will pick up our packaging as the
> > "canonical" way, and improve the way httpd is deployed out there.
>
> +1
>
> sf - how are you planning to do this, btw ;)
I think we are going to drop the separate MPM packages and
On 11/29/2011 12:23 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/29/2011 6:12 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
And, our all time favourite: LDAP.
This definitely needs separating out until it's abstraction is fixed.
Not possible due to your veto; non-optional l
On 11/29/2011 6:12 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
And, our all time favourite: LDAP.
This definitely needs separating out until it's abstraction is fixed.
Not possible due to your veto; non-optional ldap dependency of apr-util,
upon which httpd depends
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2011, at 02:37, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> FWIW
>>
>> * a normal build defaults to event
>> * a multi-MPM build of 2.4 "should" build the MPMs as DSOs
>
> +1.
>
> This is what I'm trying to nail down - to get the packaging to work ag
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
> OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
> mod_ssl
> mod_session
> mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links to openssl
(or any other library), it's all abstracted away. mod_ssl has always been
packaged separa
- Original Message -
> On 29 Nov 2011, at 02:37, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > FWIW
> >
> > * a normal build defaults to event
> > * a multi-MPM build of 2.4 "should" build the MPMs as DSOs
>
> +1.
>
> This is what I'm trying to nail down - to get the packaging to work
> against the ideal ins
On 29 Nov 2011, at 02:37, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> FWIW
>
> * a normal build defaults to event
> * a multi-MPM build of 2.4 "should" build the MPMs as DSOs
+1.
This is what I'm trying to nail down - to get the packaging to work against the
ideal installation of httpd.
What I am also keen to do i
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:24 PM, wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Nov 29 00:24:35 2011
> New Revision: 1207721
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1207721&view=rev
> Log:
> RPM: The default httpd mpm is now worker instead of prefork.
FWIW
* a normal build defaults to event
* a multi-M
10 matches
Mail list logo
