On Nov 24, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't ap_queue_info_try_get_idler() and the event_pre_config() check use :
prev_idlers = apr_atomic_add32((apr_uint32_t *)(queue_info-idlers),
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
Couldn't ap_queue_info_try_get_idler() and the event_pre_config() check
use :
On 24.11.2013 01:03, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64 (32-bit and 64-bit builds) soon. But Sun Studio on
SPARC presumably uses different explicit code in APR and I don't have access
to that.
I will try to get
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 24.11.2013 01:03, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64 (32-bit and 64-bit builds) soon. But Sun Studio on
SPARC presumably uses different
On Nov 23, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Or maybe queue_info-idlers be declared uint32_t and negatives computed
relative to 2^31 ?
What I was thinking was simply doing an offset... There
is no way we would ever use a full 32bits, signed or not,
so making the
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
On 24.11.2013 01:03, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun
Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't ap_queue_info_try_get_idler() and the event_pre_config() check
use :
prev_idlers = apr_atomic_add32((apr_uint32_t *)(queue_info-idlers),
-1);
like ap_queue_info_wait_for_idler() does ?
I think that's
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
Haven't tried it but the README
http://git.mcs.anl.gov/radix/openpa.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/README
indicates only platform support based on gcc plus
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
Haven't tried it but the README
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
l rarely try trunk except on
* Windows, which uses a system mechanism regardless of
Couldn't ap_queue_info_try_get_idler() and the event_pre_config() check use
:
prev_idlers = apr_atomic_add32((apr_uint32_t *)(queue_info-idlers),
-1);
like ap_queue_info_wait_for_idler() does ?
Or maybe queue_info-idlers be declared uint32_t and negatives computed
relative to 2^31 ?
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
l rarely try
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64 (32-bit and 64-bit builds) soon. But Sun Studio on
SPARC presumably uses different explicit code in APR and I don't have access
to that.
I will try to get that one up and running on 2.4.7.
No
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:49:31 2012
New Revision: 1410459
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1410459view=rev
Log:
fdq expects a certain behavior from atomics... ensure that
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
+i = apr_atomic_dec32(foo);
+if (i = 0) {
Why can we expect i 0? apr_atomic_dec32 returns 0 if the dec
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org
wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
+i = apr_atomic_dec32(foo);
+
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for
event... if the check fails, it means that event has
been broken on that system, assuming it ever hit
blocked idlers, for a *long*
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as required for
event... if the check fails, it means that event has
On Nov 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work as
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1542560)
is that event *checks* that atomics work
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note,
The thing is is not only do we worry about the return code
but also that the values we dec32 and inc32 also behave
as signed ints. Note below we worry also that queue_info-idlers
itself is signed, and can be 0 :
apr_status_t ap_queue_info_try_get_idler(fd_queue_info_t * queue_info)
{
int
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The thing is is not only do we worry about the return code
but also that the values we dec32 and inc32 also behave
as signed ints. Note below we worry also that queue_info-idlers
itself is signed, and can be 0 :
Okay
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:49:31 2012
New Revision: 1410459
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1410459view=rev
Log:
fdq expects a certain behavior from atomics... ensure that
the event mpms check this.
Modified:
29 matches
Mail list logo
