At 04:02 PM 3/22/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>--On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It only matters if the directory is present and contains the files we need. I
>just think a buildconf.nice would be overkill here. -- justin
Are we c
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually,
I believe a buildconf.nice is a better solution (for reasons
in my other note.) We really have no say-so about what is
s
--On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:22 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually,
I believe a buildconf.nice is a better solution (for reasons
in my other note.) We really have no say-so about what is
sitting in the directory a
At 11:11 PM 3/21/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
>Yep, i was tried of passing --with-apr and --with-apr-util to ./buildconf --
>this has nothing to do with ./config.nice, and I thought making a
>./buildconf.nice would of been a little excessive.
Of course! Now I'm on the same page with you. Actually
At 06:38 PM 3/21/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>Since moving to Subversion, having apr and apr-util at the same level as httpd
>is my typical working copy layout, so I'm definitely +1 on this change.
>srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util don't really make sense anymore, IMO. -- justin
Yup, my srclib
Sander Striker wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005
New Revision: 158303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158303
Log:
Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not
ha
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005
New Revision: 158303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158303
Log:
Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not having to
put them insid
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:19:56PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm not keen on this change, since it complicates things
> unnecessarily - some day we discover a tag and roll organized like
> this out of the blue?
>
> Does config.nice not do what you want? Especially if you rename
> it
At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Author: pquerna
>Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005
>New Revision: 158303
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158303
>Log:
>Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not having
>to put them inside srclib.
I'm not
