Done in r1632740 and r1632742.
Backport proposed in r1632744.
Thanks,
Yann.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Isn't there the same kind of potential issue in:
>> mod_bu
Hi Christophe,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Isn't there the same kind of potential issue in:
> mod_buffer, line 268
> mod_cahce, line 687
Yes both, good catches.
Do you want/plan to fix them?
Regards,
Yann.
Hi,
Isn't there the same kind of potential issue in:
mod_buffer, line 268
mod_cahce, line 687
Best regards,
CJ
Le 18/10/2014 08:57, jaillet...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jailletc36
Date: Sat Oct 18 06:57:40 2014
New Revision: 1632736
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1632736
Log:
Merge r