Late review due to compiler warning in 2.4.25 release testing, see below:
Am 29.12.2015 um 16:38 schrieb j...@apache.org:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Dec 29 15:38:29 2015
New Revision: 1722154
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1722154&view=rev
Log:
Update w/ better logging
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/core/mod_watchdog.c
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number?rev=1722154&r1=1722153&r2=1722154&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number Tue Dec 29 15:38:29 2015
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2972
+2982
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/core/mod_watchdog.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/core/mod_watchdog.c?rev=1722154&r1=1722153&r2=1722154&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/core/mod_watchdog.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/core/mod_watchdog.c Tue Dec 29 15:38:29 2015
@@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ static void* APR_THREAD_FUNC wd_worker(a
if (w->is_running) {
watchdog_list_t *wl = w->callbacks;
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, wd_server_conf->s,
- "%sWatchdog (%s) running",
- w->singleton ? "Singleton" : "", w->name);
+ APLOGNO(02972) "%sWatchdog (%s) running",
+ w->singleton ? "Singleton " : "", w->name);
apr_time_clock_hires(w->pool);
if (wl) {
apr_pool_t *ctx = NULL;
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static void* APR_THREAD_FUNC wd_worker(a
}
}
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, wd_server_conf->s,
- "%sWatchdog (%s) stopping",
- w->singleton ? "Singleton" : "", w->name);
+ APLOGNO(02973) "%sWatchdog (%s) stopping",
+ w->singleton ? "Singleton " : "", w->name);
if (locked)
apr_proc_mutex_unlock(w->mutex);
@@ -456,11 +456,16 @@ static int wd_post_config_hook(apr_pool_
const ap_list_provider_names_t *wn;
int i;
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s, APLOGNO(02974)
+ "Watchdog: found parent providers.");
+
wn = (ap_list_provider_names_t *)wl->elts;
for (i = 0; i < wl->nelts; i++) {
ap_watchdog_t *w = ap_lookup_provider(AP_WATCHDOG_PGROUP,
wn[i].provider_name,
AP_WATCHDOG_PVERSION);
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s, APLOGNO(02975)
+ "Watchdog: Looking for parent (%s).", wn[i].provider_name);
if (w) {
if (!w->active) {
int status = ap_run_watchdog_need(s, w->name, 1,
@@ -481,6 +486,8 @@ static int wd_post_config_hook(apr_pool_
"Watchdog: Failed to create parent worker
thread.");
return rv;
}
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, rv, s, APLOGNO(02976)
+ "Watchdog: Created parent worker thread (%s).",
w->name);
wd_server_conf->parent_workers++;
}
}
@@ -495,13 +502,17 @@ static int wd_post_config_hook(apr_pool_
AP_WATCHDOG_CVERSION))) {
const ap_list_provider_names_t *wn;
int i;
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s, APLOGNO(02977)
+ "Watchdog: found child providers.");
wn = (ap_list_provider_names_t *)wl->elts;
for (i = 0; i < wl->nelts; i++) {
ap_watchdog_t *w = ap_lookup_provider(AP_WATCHDOG_PGROUP,
wn[i].provider_name,
AP_WATCHDOG_CVERSION);
- if (w) {
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s, APLOGNO(02978)
+ "Watchdog: Looking for child (%s).", wn[i].provider_name);
+ if (w) {
if (!w->active) {
int status = ap_run_watchdog_need(s, w->name, 0,
w->singleton);
@@ -524,7 +535,9 @@ static int wd_post_config_hook(apr_pool_
return rv;
}
}
- wd_server_conf->child_workers++;
+ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, rv, s, APLOGNO(02979)
+ "Watchdog: Created child worker thread (%s).",
w->name);
> + wd_server_conf->child_workers++;
Here "rv" is used potentially uninitialized as a log argument. More
complete snippet:
526 if (w->active) {
527 /* We have some callbacks registered.
528 * Create mutexes for singleton watchdogs
529 */
530 if (w->singleton) {
531 rv = ap_proc_mutex_create(&w->mutex, NULL,
wd_proc_mutex_type,
532 w->name, s,
533
wd_server_conf->pool, 0);
534 if (rv != APR_SUCCESS) {
535 return rv;
536 }
537 }
538 ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, rv, s,
APLOGNO(02979)
539 "Watchdog: Created child worker thread
(%s).", w->name);
540 wd_server_conf->child_workers++;
541 }
"rv" is only set in the w->singleton case. The log message itself also
does not really reflect what is happening here, so I'm unsure what the
correct fix is, replacing "rv" by "0" in the logging, or move the log
message into the w->singleton block and log mutex creation instead of
thread creation?
Regards,
Rainer
