Re: svn commit: r219520 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/

2005-07-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:43 AM 7/20/2005, Joe Orton wrote: >Is this refactoring complete? Apart from the compiler warnings, a bunch >of the t/ssl/proxy.t tests have started failing with the trunk code. >With worker, the server is dumping core: > >(this seems to be a regression since 2005-07-15, when all the test

Re: svn commit: r219520 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/

2005-07-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:58:21AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > Thanks Paul, you just collided with the refactoring of 2.1.x proxy. Is this refactoring complete? Apart from the compiler warnings, a bunch of the t/ssl/proxy.t tests have started failing with the trunk code. With worker, the serv

Re: svn commit: r219520 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/

2005-07-18 Thread Roy T. Fielding
Thanks Paul, you just collided with the refactoring of 2.1.x proxy. That isn't possible. Trunk is still trunk. Thank you for not announcing this first. That isn't necessary. Thank you for ignoring the entire user community in your zeal to move forward with ... what? Preparing a tarball

Re: svn commit: r219520 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/

2005-07-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Thanks Paul, you just collided with the refactoring of 2.1.x proxy. Thank you for not announcing this first. Thank you for ignoring the entire user community in your zeal to move forward with ... what? Thank you for helping the entire dev community begin refactoring httpd 2.3 long before there i