On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Does this really require a CHANGES entry??
No. There is at least one other CHANGES entry about a changed comment,
though.
CHANGES isn't, and shouldn't be, an external replacement for svn
Does this *really* require a CHANGES entry??
On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:35 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Oct 7 19:35:09 2009
New Revision: 822870
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=822870view=rev
Log:
Update comments in util_filter.h about bucket and brigade ownership
to
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Does this really require a CHANGES entry??
No. There is at least one other CHANGES entry about a changed comment,
though.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Does this *really* require a CHANGES entry??
no
On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:35 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Oct 7 19:35:09 2009
New Revision: 822870
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=822870view=rev
