On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have noted the following on ReliantUnix:
+++
Installing configuration files
Installing HTML documents
Usage: rm [-firR] file ...
make[1]: *** [install-htdocs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
I just noticed that the '- ' prefix isn't being used anywhere else in our
Makefiles. Are we sure it's portable?
Mmm. not 100%.
On FreeBSD:
mkdir /x1/home/jwoolley/test-38p1/manual
test x/x1/home/jwoolley/test-38p1/htdocs != x cd
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On FreeBSD:
- seems to work, but - doesn't. I'll try the - on all the
platforms I have access to and see if that one works. Will it work on
ReliantUnix?
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have noted the following on ReliantUnix:
+++
Installing configuration files
Installing HTML documents
Usage: rm [-firR] file ...
make[1]: *** [install-htdocs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home1/apache20/httpd-2.0.37'
make: ***
Cliff Woolley wrote:
... in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
--Cliff
I have noted the following on ReliantUnix:
+++
Installing configuration files
Installing HTML documents
Usage: rm [-firR] file ...
make[1]: *** [install-htdocs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
... in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
--Cliff
:
Subject: tarballs are up for testing
06/11/2002 11:03
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David McCreedy wrote:
Are there tarballs for 1.3.25 or just 2.0.37?
Just 2.0.37. Though I'm having a bit of trouble with the 2.0.37
tarball... it might be bogus. I untarred it as myself on icarus and ran
my ./config.nice... it went fine up until the end, where I got lots
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 June 2002 19:37
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David McCreedy wrote:
Are there tarballs for 1.3.25 or just 2.0.37?
Just 2.0.37. Though I'm having a bit of trouble with the 2.0.37
tarball... it might be bogus. I untarred it as myself on
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David McCreedy wrote:
Are there tarballs for 1.3.25 or just 2.0.37?
Just 2.0.37. Though I'm having a bit of trouble with the 2.0.37
tarball... it might be bogus. I untarred it as myself on icarus and ran
my ./config.nice...
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Hmm.. Just downloaded the tarball and the ./configure script runs
fine... The only thing I noticed is that if instead of running the
shipped ./configure, I regenerate it with autoconf-2.53, then it
complains in all possible sort of ways...
Via
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Hmm.. Just downloaded the tarball and the ./configure script runs
fine... The only thing I noticed is that if instead of running the
shipped ./configure, I regenerate it with autoconf-2.53, then it
2.0.37 is up and running on Nagoya.Apache.ORG... For this one I just used
GCC 3.1 in 32 bits mode (it's the main install and I don't want to screw up
things too quickly! :)
Logs can be seen in /opt/apache/logs for those who have accounts and are
interested...
Pier
root@nagoya]
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Hmm.. Just downloaded the tarball and the ./configure script runs
fine... The only thing I noticed is that if instead of running the
shipped ./configure, I regenerate it with autoconf-2.53, then it
complains
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's pretty annoying. But it still works. :)
Does it? The first thing I did was to step back to 2.52... Ok, then... Since
I reinstalled it now, I'll keep it and ignore the warning... :)
Pier
15 matches
Mail list logo
