i had some trouble to bring auth_ldap to work. I solved the problems
but not to my complete satisfaction. The reason for this is the way
auth_ldap does the authentication with the ldap server.
Here the sequence of operations auth_ldap does in a default ldap
setup. In this setup anyone has read
Hi!
I'm pretty sure I've seen something about this on the list,
but I can't seem to find the threads now. And it might be
me doing something wrong ;)
/bin/sh /php/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -g -pthread-DOSF1
-I/php/apr/include -I/php/apr-util/include
Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:10:12PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:02 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
wrote:
So if absolutely anything added to the dev branch must have a vote
for before merging back to the stable branch, I stand corrected and
will
Cliff Woolley wrote:
If you go into the apr-util directory and run ./configure --help, among
other things it will tell you:
--with-ldap-include=path path to ldap include files with trailing slash
--with-ldap-lib=pathpath to ldap lib file
--with-ldap=library ldap library to use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gstein 2003/02/27 04:53:19
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
trawick wanted commentary in STATUS rather than on the mailing list.
fine...
I don't care whether commentary on this topic is in STATUS or on the
mailing list (I for one put
I'd guess this has bitten a lot of people. There are several cases, in
which mod_rewrite runs into a deadloop of internal redirects.
I think, we can fix it by counting the times the fixup hook effectively
works (regardless of equality of the uris) and stop after a configurable
limit, e.g.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
They should, ap_run_pre_connection is an Apache hook. Yes, it returns
an int, so the only change here should be
-apr_status_t rc;
+int rc;
We aren't calling apr_ function here, and hooks always allow OK, DONE,
or (result).
ahh, that's the missing piece of
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:07:31PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
I'd guess this has bitten a lot of people. There are several cases, in
which mod_rewrite runs into a deadloop of internal redirects.
I think, we can fix it by counting the times the fixup hook effectively
works (regardless of
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:55 PM -0800 Greg Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And remember: this *is* source control. If somebody commits a bug
fix and people want to shoot it down, then we can revert it. But
assuming correctness and committing the fix is hella
Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:10:12PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:02 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if absolutely anything added to the dev branch must have a vote
for before merging back to the stable branch, I stand
Greg Ames wrote:
mind. Letting the fixes age a bit in the unstable tree reduces the
probability of unpleasant surprises happening in the stable tree, at
least for mainline code. We can be extra diligent about
reviewing/testing changes that we know are not mainline.
Note that for me and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+ Yes, I'm ranting, and hey, I'm even sober. :-)
=:o
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:53 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ The problem here is that R-T-C expresses a fundamental
+ DISTRUST of your peers. We had problems stabilizing the
+ code simply because there are numerous interests in the
+
* Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:07:31PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
RewriteOptions MaxRedirects=x
where x defaults to 10 or so.
mod_rewrite could store that value in r-request_config. If it's exceeded,
a config error is assumed and an error logged. The response should be 500
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Trevor Hurst wrote:
Because when I run the make I get the following errors:
-static -c mod_auth_ldap.c touch mod_auth_ldap.lo
mod_auth_ldap.c:82:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to have LDAP
support built in
If you go into
André Malo wrote:
* Mads Toftum wrote:
Generally I like the idea, but I'm a bit wary about setting a default value
other than unlimited because it could break existing configs.
hmm, the idea behind is actually to break the configs (anyway) to prevent
the server from crashing. 10 internal
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 05:07 PM 2/26/2003, Greg Ames wrote:
Sure. A handler which does its own apr_file_open looses the ability to use sendfile.
Who cares?
Only people who value performance.
That's an APR implementation-dependent detail that you (the module/app author) has minimal
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:17:57PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
hmm, the idea behind is actually to break the configs (anyway) to prevent
the server from crashing. 10 internal redirects are already a lot ones. But
however, we could let it default to, 20, 50 or 100. I don't believe that
such a
As far as I can tell this is a bug in the Sprint
PCS Connect support for AcceptEx, (they install a
Winsock transport provider called BMI). However, it slips
through our checks and causes the accept thread to
hard loop and consume most of the cpu.
What happens is that in get_listeners_from_parent()
Humm... how do our friends at MS solve this in IIS?
Bill
Allan Edwards wrote:
As far as I can tell this is a bug in the Sprint
PCS Connect support for AcceptEx, (they install a
Winsock transport provider called BMI). However, it slips
through our checks and causes the accept thread to
hard loop
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Humm... how do our friends at MS solve this in IIS?
It only happens because of our parent-child process
model. If you run -X the problem goes away. It's the
socket duplication that seems to bite us.
Allan
Since the target value is in second, it should be possible to use
r-request_time instead of calling apr_time_now().
I ran a load test on my box and did not ever see a difference between the
sec value in r-request_time and the one returned by apr_time_now().
end of the patchpart..
Allan Edwards wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Humm... how do our friends at MS solve this in IIS?
It only happens because of our parent-child process
model. If you run -X the problem goes away. It's the
socket duplication that seems to bite us.
Allan
Perhaps we need a winnt mpm directive to force
Perhaps we need a winnt mpm directive to force the server to use the
Win9* accept code path. Whould be a terrible thing to do on a production
level server (for performance reasons) but quite okay for most of the
folks that are seeing personal firewalls collide with our use of AcceptEx.
mmm...
Hi Madhu,
* MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I haven't gone through the entire stuff, but some quick questions, based on
your patch :
Thanks for the initial feedback, it's certainly useful to know this code
has been on other people's minds, and that I didn't
Jeff Trawick wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
They should, ap_run_pre_connection is an Apache hook. Yes, it returns
an int, so the only change here should be
-apr_status_t rc;
+int rc;
We aren't calling apr_ function here, and hooks always allow OK, DONE,
or (result).
ahh, that's
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
The current version checks are
implemented in a cock-eyed fashion and are also out of date (0.9.6e used
to be a meaningful cut-off point, but that has changed more recently).
I agree that the current check is
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/04 19:08:59 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/24 00:00:05 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Trevor Hurst wrote:
Because when I run the make I get the following errors:
-static -c mod_auth_ldap.c touch mod_auth_ldap.lo
mod_auth_ldap.c:82:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to have LDAP
support built in
If you go into
Trevor Hurst wrote:
setting APRUTIL_INCLUDES to -I/usr/freeware/include/
setting APRUTIL_LDFLAGS to -L/usr/freeware/lib32/libldap.so.3
the argument of -L should be a directory, not a file
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Trevor Hurst wrote:
setting APRUTIL_INCLUDES to -I/usr/freeware/include/
setting APRUTIL_LDFLAGS to -L/usr/freeware/lib32/libldap.so.3
the argument of -L should be a directory, not a file
Acutally, sorry, my mistake, that was the output of another configure
I
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
it would be useful if ./configure --help for Apache would also display
apr and apr-util --help screen if the Apache configure is going to
configure apr and apr-util as well
++1!
I am working on the next rev of this patch fixing some of the problems
pointed out by Justin and Bill R. I have the most concern about protocol
negotiation. What's in store for HTTP post 1.1? We may have much bigger
problems than simply replacing a filter.
Bill
* Mads Toftum wrote:
On second thought (after looking through my odd collection of rewrite examples)
I do tend to agree with you, since I'm having a very hard time imagining
any case where even more than a couple would be useful. So I'm all for
limiting to 10 (or even 5 for that matter) as
It is heavily based off of mod_authn_mysql. It uses libdbi(
http://libdbi.sf.net ) as an abstraction layer.
I personaly have only had a chance to use MySQL as a backend, it should work
easily with PgSQL if libdbi does its job.
You can get it now on:
http://open.cyanworlds.com/
I even bothered
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
37 matches
Mail list logo
