I'm close to finish the ocsp feature on mod_ssl, but when i look the
entire client auth system, there is some little point not really clean.
For example, when somebody today setup a SSLVerifyClient require and put
CA and CRL, with SSLCARevocationPath, if no CRL is correct inside the
path,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:58:06PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that was fixed in 1.5.10. For an autoconf 2.59-generated
configure script the only reference to grep -E is in the test to see
whether grep -E works or not, so that looks fixed to me
IMO the current setting for how proxy_balancer handles
lbfactor isn't intuitive... For example, if I
setup 2 members, one with a lbfactor of 1 and another
with 2 (eg: a lbfactor=1 ; b lbfactor=2) then one
would expect 'b' handle twice the amount of traffic
than 'a'. Now if set to 33 and 66, then
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adjust properties:
- svn:eol-style = native
- svn:keywords = LastChangedRevision for mod_dumpio.xml
Are these documented somewhere? Not what they mean, but what our
standards are as far as these are concerned, etc...? I hate
looking like
* Ryan Bloom wrote:
I'm sorry, but no it is not. I know something about this, and we
spent a lot of time and energy trying to ensure that a config that
worked in 1.3 worked the same way in 2.0.
Well, you had no luck, it seems.
That's just not true. 90% of the directives in Apache
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Please note that the patch doesn't include the error
checking for lbfactor being 0, which is trivial...
I always wanted to get rid of that recalc factors algo.
It's leftover from old balancer algorithm, so +1 from me.
Mladen.
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
Sorry again. ;)
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:45:15 -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/11/10 18:05:46 $]
Release:
2.0.53
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:01:35PM +0800, hutuworm wrote:
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
Sorry again. ;)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
It's been updated in Subversion. It's that Ken hasn't updated his script to
use Subversion instead of CVS.
I fixed it in SVN trunk. Ken's scripts are still checking this all out
from the old CVS repository, which is now closed. Ken, please update your
scripts.
--Cliff
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, hutuworm wrote:
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
Sorry again. ;)
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004
At 11:10 PM 12/15/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
I fixed it in SVN trunk. Ken's scripts are still checking this all out
from the old CVS repository, which is now closed. Ken, please update your
scripts.
Actually, since that may take some time, please take the now-svn
repositories out of your cron
Hi,
I am writing a mod_perl module that makes mod_ssl optional functions
accessible via perl. I have currently implemented ssl_is_https() and
ssl_var_lookup() which is enough for my needs.
For the sake of completeness I am wondering if ssl_engine_disable() and
ssl_proxy_enable() need to be
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/10/30 13:20:38 $]
Release:
1.3.34-dev: In development.
1.3.33: Tagged October 27, 2004
1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004. Not formally released.
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/11/10 18:05:46 $]
Release:
2.0.53 : in development
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
2.0.51 : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stas
Date: Wed Dec 15 08:08:52 2004
New Revision: 111983
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=111983
Log:
- general config: adjust Apache/TestConfig.pm not to write irrelevant
httpd.conf sections (e.g. IfModule prefork.c for win32, and vice
versa, A-T
Stas Bekman wrote:
Chris, if you are still looking at what to do to improve A-T, I think
this two new todo items might be of interest to you.
I'm knee deep in another project at the moment, but I'm sure I'll get
sick of it and need a break by the end of the weekend.
No problem, there is no
I still need to take a crack at the mp2 RC and see if it will build
on my setup as well.
that's definitely more important!
I would think so. I did a quick test that night, and I still couldn't do
a stock perl Makefile.PL and have it find libs without doing perl
Makefile.PL
16 matches
Mail list logo
