Re: Endless loop in split_on_bdry() of library/parser_multipart.c?
Quoting Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Seems to be Fedora Core X specific. Happens on x84_64 as well and with 2.07. Rebuilding the package in Fedora Extras 5 now. -- Bojan
debug apache
Hi, i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me follwing: Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the flow of a request? eg: $REQUEST accepted on $FD $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST send to client or $REQUEST accepted on $FD $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST handled by $MOD_PROXY_xxx $REQUEST send on $FD to $PROXY $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx $REQUEST send to client I hope i have asked clean enough so that anybody can answer my question ;-) regards Alex
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debug apache
it's a very good idea to add this!From: Alexander Lazic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:14:11 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debug apacheHi,i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked mefollwing:Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see theflow of a request?eg:$REQUEST accepted on $FD$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST send to clientor$REQUEST accepted on $FD$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST handled by $MOD_PROXY_xxx$REQUEST send on $FD to $PROXY$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx$REQUEST send to clientI hope i have asked clean enough so that anybody can answer my question;-)regardsAlex
Re: svn commit: r395211 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:01:44PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/19/2006 12:57 PM,
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Apr 19 03:57:20 2006
New Revision: 395211
...
+if test x$with_included_apr = xyes; then
+ apr_found=reconfig
+ apr_config=$srcdir/srclib/apr/apr-1-config
+else
Is it really a good idea to hardcode apr-1-config or shouldn't it be
something like
apr-?-config (Same question for apu-1-config below)?
The 1 requirement is hardcoded in the APR_FIND_APx calls anyway, so I
don't think this is a big deal. They could all be replaced with some
variable I suppose.
+if test x$with_included_apr = xyes; then
+ apu_found=reconfig
+ apu_config=${srcdir}/srclib/apr-util/apu-1-config
+else
+ APR_FIND_APU($srcdir/srclib/apr-util, ./srclib/apr-util, 1, 1)
+fi
joe
Re: httpd-win.conf broken on trunk
Garrett Rooney wrote: It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to point me to some sort of documentation on how exactly one goes from The old way to The new way... Garrett please take a look at my commits a couple hrs ago, see if they are in sync with the direction you want to go. Need to look to backporting as these changes are needed on 2.2 IIRC. Bill
Re: Endless loop in split_on_bdry() of library/parser_multipart.c?
Bojan Smojver wrote: Quoting Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At least now it's a bit clearer why the no-strict-aliasing optimization is getting confused ;-) Hey, speak for yourself ;-) FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE gcc version 4.1.2 20060526 (prerelease) gcc version 3.4.4 20050518 default maintainer mode CFLAGS work and I can also use combination of these: -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer Seems to be Fedora Core X specific. Should we figure out how to re-write the loop so it doesn't matter, add a prereq check in build/version_check.pl, or just leave it ? -- Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com 1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F It takes a minute to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone, and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone...
Re: Endless loop in split_on_bdry() of library/parser_multipart.c?
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 02:34 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Seems to be Fedora Core X specific. Yeah, very possible. Should we figure out how to re-write the loop so it doesn't matter, add a prereq check in build/version_check.pl, or just leave it ? I maintain Fedora Extras libapreq2 package and I already applied the relevant flag. Let's see what compiler folks tell us and then we can rewrite if needed. -- Bojan
Re: svn commit: r395211 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote: The 1 requirement is hardcoded in the APR_FIND_APx calls anyway, so I don't think this is a big deal. They could all be replaced with some variable I suppose. Can you replace them with a variable, such that later on only this variable needs to be adjusted? Then I would be +1 for backport immediately. Sure, done, r410828. joe
Re: svn commit: r395211 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Joe Orton Can you replace them with a variable, such that later on only this variable needs to be adjusted? Then I would be +1 for backport immediately. Sure, done, r410828. Thanks. +1 on backport to 2.2.x Regards Rüdiger
Re: httpd-win.conf broken on trunk
On 6/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to point me to some sort of documentation on how exactly one goes from The old way to The new way... Garrett please take a look at my commits a couple hrs ago, see if they are in sync with the direction you want to go. Need to look to backporting as these changes are needed on 2.2 IIRC. They seem reasonable to me, although I haven't tried them out. One thing that seems odd, it looks like Makefile.win is still copying docs/conf/httpd-win.conf to conf/httpd.conf.default, isn't the goal of the previous changes to get a massaged version of httpd-std.conf.in there? -garrett
Re: svn commit: r410757 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf.in
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add example/default allow-from for localhost, please??? Location /server-status SetHandler server-status Require host .example.com +Allow from 127 /Location I think you are looking for Require ip 127 or something like that. But I'm not sure why it is necessary. We've always just used .example.com here, haven't we? Joshua.
Re: svn commit: r410758 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-dav.conf.in
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ewww... can't we be consistant with our workfiles paths? -DavLockDB @@ServerRoot@@/var/DavLock +DavLockDB @exp_runtimedir@/DavLock I believe the issue here is that exp_runtimedir is writable only by root, while DavLockDB needs to be writable by child processes. I tried to introduce the var directory in the docs as an example of a child-writable directory, and have tried to use it consistently as such. I consider the stuff in conf/extra to be essentially documentation, not necessarily working configurations. Joshua.
Re: svn commit: r410761 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.in
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Wed May 31 22:42:13 2006 New Revision: 410761 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=410761view=rev Log: That's the point, isn't it? All mpm's in one basket? Sure, but windows has its own config file where we left the mpm_winnt stuff in. So putting it here is duplication. Joshua.
Re: svn commit: r410757 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf.in
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:17:27AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add example/default allow-from for localhost, please??? Location /server-status SetHandler server-status Require host .example.com +Allow from 127 /Location I think you are looking for Require ip 127 or something like that. But I'm not sure why it is necessary. We've always just used .example.com here, haven't we? I agree it would be better to omit it. It's misleading to say that 127.0.0.0/8 is sufficient to allow access from the local host anyway; on any IPv6-enabled host you need to allow access from ::1 too. joe
Re: svn commit: r410761 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.in
On 6/1/06, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Wed May 31 22:42:13 2006 New Revision: 410761 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=410761view=rev Log: That's the point, isn't it? All mpm's in one basket? Sure, but windows has its own config file where we left the mpm_winnt stuff in. So putting it here is duplication. Considering that the httpd-win.conf file is so out of date that it doesn't even work, I think Bill's goal here is to make it use the same configuration files as the rest of the platforms... -garrett
Re: There should be a filter spec
On 5/26/06, Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I need a specification that tells me what a filter must/should and must not/should not do. Is there something alike? My actual problem is that I have a filter that if nothing was modified drops all content, sets f-r-status to 304 and sends an eos bucket. This works. If I pass the output through mod_transform the browser does get a 200 without content instead. So probably mod_transform is broken. But it is difficult to decide what is broken without such a spec. I've had similar issues lately, it's very unclear how a filter setting f-r-status or f-r-status_line should act. Depending on what modules your working with, that may be enough to get an error out to the browser, and it may not. Some specific rules about that sort of thing would be quite useful... -garrett
Re: There should be a filter spec
von Garrett Rooney Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 16:32 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: There should be a filter spec I've had similar issues lately, it's very unclear how a filter setting f-r-status or f-r-status_line should act. Depending on what modules your working with, that may be enough to get an error out to the browser, and it may not. Some specific rules about that sort of thing would be quite useful... As far as I remember there had been also a discussion on who owns a brigade. So who has to call / should not call apr_brigade_destroy / apr_brigade_cleanup in the filter chain. I think rules for this would be also useful. Regards Rüdiger
Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter
Francois Pesce wrote: These patches may fix the r-content_type behaviour. Are you OK with it ? +1 -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies
Re: httpd-win.conf broken on trunk
Garrett Rooney wrote: One thing that seems odd, it looks like Makefile.win is still copying docs/conf/httpd-win.conf to conf/httpd.conf.default, isn't the goal of the previous changes to get a massaged version of httpd-std.conf.in there? future tense, yes. These were just glaring things I tripped over and streamlining the extras copy that were already committed. I think the one issue with using httpd-std.conf.in is the list of modules to load; netware has an awk script which accomplishes this - perhaps we piggyback on the same script? Bill
Re: svn commit: r410757 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-info.conf.in
Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:17:27AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add example/default allow-from for localhost, please??? Location /server-status SetHandler server-status Require host .example.com +Allow from 127 /Location I think you are looking for Require ip 127 or something like that. Of course, thank you... But I'm not sure why it is necessary. We've always just used .example.com here, haven't we? These were; #Order deny,allow #Deny from all #Allow from .your_domain.com which is slight different than saying .example.com to someone trying to understand these modules. I agree it would be better to omit it. It's misleading to say that 127.0.0.0/8 is sufficient to allow access from the local host anyway; on any IPv6-enabled host you need to allow access from ::1 too. Require ip 127 ::1 or whatnot then? Yes, this is a good point, perhaps using localhost makes more sense (sure folks break that dns entry, but better that, than to fight ip local syntaxes ;-) If consensus says ignore this issue (default to allowing the admin to look at their local machine's status) then I'll revert this commit rather than fix. Bill
[PATCH] add notfound to mod_rewrite rule
patch against 2.2.2 (but should work on most other versions). Adds the
notfound (NF) flag to rewriterule that will case it to return
HTTP_NOT_FOUND for matched, similar to the gone and forbidden options.
--- mod_rewrite.c.bak 2006-06-01 15:25:48.0 -0400
+++ mod_rewrite.c 2006-06-01 15:29:18.0 -0400
@@ -3264,6 +3264,11 @@
|| !strcasecmp(key, ocase)) {/* nocase */
cfg-flags |= RULEFLAG_NOCASE;
}
+else if (((*key == 'F' || *key == 'f') !key[1])
+ || !strcasecmp(key, otfound)) { /* notfound */
+cfg-flags |= (RULEFLAG_STATUS | RULEFLAG_NOSUB);
+cfg-forced_responsecode = HTTP_NOT_FOUND;
+}
else {
++error;
}
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Re: [PATCH] add notfound to mod_rewrite rule
* Brian Akins wrote: patch against 2.2.2 (but should work on most other versions). Adds the notfound (NF) flag to rewriterule that will case it to return HTTP_NOT_FOUND for matched, similar to the gone and forbidden options. We don't need this, because you can use [R=404]. F and G are already just syntactic sugar. nd -- Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3) -- aus einer Rezension http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
Re: [PATCH] add notfound to mod_rewrite rule
André Malo wrote: We don't need this, because you can use [R=404]. F and G are already just syntactic sugar. From the docs: 'redirect|R [=code]' (force redirect) Prefix Substitution with http://thishost[:thisport]/ (which makes the new URL a URI) to force a external redirection. If no code is given, a HTTP response of 302 (MOVED TEMPORARILY) will be returned. If you want to use other response codes in the range 300-400, simply specify the appropriate number or use one of the following symbolic names: temp (default), permanent, seeother. Use this for rules to canonicalize the URL and return it to the client - to translate ``/~'' into ``/u/'', or to always append a slash to /u/user, etc. So do the docs need to be updated to say: return arbitrary http code? BTW, this does work. patch withdrawn. somebody needs to fix docs... -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies
Re: [PATCH] add notfound to mod_rewrite rule
* Brian Akins wrote: 'redirect|R [=code]' (force redirect) Prefix Substitution with http://thishost[:thisport]/ (which makes the new URL a URI) to force a external redirection. If no code is given, a HTTP response of 302 (MOVED TEMPORARILY) will be returned. If you want to use other response codes in the range 300-400, simply specify the appropriate number or use one of the following symbolic names: temp (default), permanent, seeother. Use this for rules to canonicalize the URL and return it to the client - to translate ``/~'' into ``/u/'', or to always append a slash to /u/user, etc. So do the docs need to be updated to say: return arbitrary http code? BTW, this does work. patch withdrawn. somebody needs to fix docs... Yeah, good point. This could really need some better wording. ;) nd -- Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3) -- aus einer Rezension http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
