Hi,
I am in the process of evaluating Apache 2.2 using mod_proxy_balancer
and mod_proxy_ajp as a replacement for our good old 1.3/mod_jk setup
as a front-end to Tomcat 5.5.
I found several problems during this process.
* redirect feature of balanced workers does not work as advertised.
The
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:29, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/28/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with DAV + SSL hardware.
It appears to be the issue described in
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-03/0549.shtml
It seems to me that the ability to rewrite a
On 09/29/2006 09:53 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
So redirection is only used when handling session bound requests which
is exactly the opposite of what the documentation said.
The goal of graceful worker shutdown is therefore not achieved as
there is no way to have session bound requests
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:15:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c Thu Sep 28 13:15:42 2006
@@ -837,6 +837,11 @@
APR_BLOCK_READ, HUGE_STRING_LEN);
Bringing this up. again.
Adds a filter that allows mod_setenvif to act on response headers.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:24:33 +0200
From: Francois Pesce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
To:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of evaluating Apache 2.2 using mod_proxy_balancer
and mod_proxy_ajp as a replacement for our good old 1.3/mod_jk setup
as a front-end to Tomcat 5.5.
I found several problems during this process.
...
I have other
+1 on the patch
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
On 9/29/06, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bringing this up. again.
Adds a filter that allows mod_setenvif to act on response headers.
FWIW, I like it :) Have been wanting to do it myself, but have not
found the time.
-B
On 9/29/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:15:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c Thu Sep 28 13:15:42 2006
@@ -837,6 +837,11 @@
On 09/29/2006 03:49 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/29/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:15:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c Thu Sep 28
On 9/29/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:29, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/28/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with DAV + SSL hardware.
It appears to be the issue described in
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-03/0549.shtml
On Friday 29 September 2006 15:45, Garrett Rooney wrote:
My only comment about the patch itself is I'm not overly thrilled
about recursively processing matches, simply because every time we
recurse we allocate an entire new string to hold the entire results,
which seems wasteful. But on the
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:16:24PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
It seems to me that the ability to rewrite a request header
will fix that. As a generic fix, I've patched mod_headers
to support regexp-based rewriting of arbitrary headers.
+1 from the peanut gallery - I've had to do similar hackery
Joost de Heer wrote:
I tend to say that
disabled means: Take requests if their routing information matches mine but
no other ones.
stopped means: Take no requests at all.
enabled means: Take all requests.
Wouldn't 'standby' be a better name for the functionality
On 09/29/2006 06:28 PM, Joost de Heer wrote:
I tend to say that
disabled means: Take requests if their routing information matches
mine but
no other ones.
stopped means: Take no requests at all.
enabled means: Take all requests.
Wouldn't 'standby' be a better name for
15 matches
Mail list logo
