On 10/18/2008 10:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Plus the default socket and TCP buffers on most OS should be already
larger then this. So in order to profit from the optimization the time
the client needs to consume the ProxyIOBufferSize needs to be
On 10/19/2008 01:21 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/18/2008 10:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Plus the default socket and TCP buffers on most OS should be already
larger then this. So in order to profit from the optimization the time
the client needs to
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
* apr_dbd_pvquery is only for string values.
You must use apr_dbd_pvbquery (with a b) for binary values.
see:
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/1.3/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html
I tried both versions, but without success. But that was because I did not
pass
Hello All,
After spending quite some time on apache and components ( specifically
mod_proxy_http, mod_mem_cache etc) we have noticed some memory leaks which
we are publishing with attached patch.
The leak can be observed when requests are sent on keep-alive connection
without closing the
Hi Tom,
Thanks a lot for your help! Everything works as expected...
Cheers,
Andrej
On Oct 18, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Ruediger Pluem schrieb:
On 10/18/2008 01:25 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Looking at a problem that seems easy to re-produce using un-patched
trunk, 2.2.10 and 2.0.63.
Using a graceful restart causes higher memory usage in the parent,
which
is
On Oct 18, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
As a result, the connection pool has made the server slower, not
faster,
and very much needs to be fixed.
I agree in theory. But I don't think so in practice.
Unfortunately I know so in practice. In this example we
On 10/19/2008 07:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
As a result, the connection pool has made the server slower, not
faster,
and very much needs to be fixed.
I agree in theory. But I don't think so in practice.
On 10/19/2008 07:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Ruediger Pluem schrieb:
On 10/18/2008 01:25 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Looking at a problem that seems easy to re-produce using un-patched
trunk, 2.2.10 and 2.0.63.
Using a graceful restart
2008/10/15 Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
2008/10/15 Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Nicob wrote:
[...]
This issue does have some security implications. For example a revoked
client certificate could
10 matches
Mail list logo