On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 00:51, Jos Ewert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Im trying to modify mod_fcgid to suit my needs, but I have a problem with
reading my newly added config directive.
For some reason it sets the config in my setter right but in the getter it
always reads the default value.
Ahhh found out what went wrong, I made a wrong merge. the local server config
contained the right config , where the one that actually made it into the final
config was the base config.
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported and
Thanks for the observation. Fixed in r718015.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 11/16/2008 02:23 AM, Takashi Sato wrote:
In trunk these files are missing svn:eol-style native
docs\manual\mod\mod_buffer.html
docs\manual\mod\mod_buffer.html.en
docs\manual\mod\mod_buffer.xml
* Takashi Sato wrote:
In trunk these files are missing [...]
Go ahead. You don't need to ask for that ;)
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
[EMAIL PROTECTED] split/::/ =__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
I am ISV developing a system that is using Apache. All the frontend's
for system I am developing are all custom desktop applications, or web
browsers controls wrapped in my own code. Thus users are not going to
be entering username and password, the username and password used will
be depended on
On 11/16/2008 12:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+/* Do nothing if asked to filter nothing. */
+if (APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY(bb)) {
+return ap_pass_brigade(f-next, bb);
+}
Hm. This changes the order in which we sent the brigades (provided we
have already
On Nov 15, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month),
but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is
ess Holle schrieb:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Given the positive feedback: Please vote now on the backports :-).
I /really/ want to see a sub-second proxy connection timeout as this is
needed due to Windows' inappropriate RFC interpretation. This
Cool. Thanks!
I'll anxiously await 2.2.11 then.
Rainer Jung wrote:
Jess Holle schrieb:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Given the positive feedback: Please vote now on the backports :-).
I /really/ want to see a sub-second proxy
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Thanks for clarification. Nevertheless we should make it more clear in the
documentation that this module can make performance worse if used in the
wrong context, e.g. with static files. Otherwise users might think that
buffering files via mod_buffer could be a cool
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+/* pass flush and metadata buckets through */
+if (APR_BUCKET_IS_FLUSH(e) || APR_BUCKET_IS_METADATA(e)) {
This is redundant as flush buckets are metadata buckets :-).
+APR_BUCKET_REMOVE(e);
+
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Hello, Nick
It seems to me we have similar ideas to enhance web-application
security. I've focused on SELinux to utilize security features
of operating system.
I had a plan to start discussion after my PostgreSQL works are
closed, but, it is a good time to start discussion to utilize
them for
15 matches
Mail list logo
