On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:47:16PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sent: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 23:58
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_deflate DoS using HEAD
Nick Kew wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
I'm confused. Why do this check so late, and why does r-bytes_sent
matter? Why does it screw up the protocol if the DEFLATE filter does
nothing for a HEAD request? Because of the concern that a HEAD will
return a different C-L C-E to a GET on the same resource with
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 09:51
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_deflate DoS using HEAD
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:47:16PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger,
VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
Hi,
I studied this error and I undestand that error is created for ProxyPass.
My httpd.conf:
IfModule rewrite_module
RewriteEngine on
RewriteLog /usr/local/apache2/logs/rewrite_log
RewriteLogLevel 5
RewriteLock /usr/local/apache2/logs/file.lock
Hi,
I've resolvel this error.
Thank you
Ricardo
ricardo13 wrote:
Hi,
I have a webcluster and I'm prioritize the requests.
I modify request_rec adding a field called prior and conditional test (
IF() ) in mod_rewrite for classify.
All time that start APACHE show the follow:
#
William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net writes:
Joe Orton wrote:
Does 2616 mandate that a resource must always
exactly the same set of content-codings across methods and time?
(AFAICT there is no MUST on that front; it's a SHOULD if anything)
Read through to the end, it breaks all
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:39 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I modified request_rec simply adding a field in request_rec.
Now, I would like get this field in worker.c
My doubt about this is because worker.c manipulates only sockets and doesn't
request_rec object.
How
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
I'm confused. Why do this check so late, and why does r-bytes_sent
matter? Why does it screw up the protocol if the DEFLATE
All depends on the first brigade that passes mod_deflate. If this brigade
contains the
I haven't looked at the code, but +1 for the idea. We had a hack that did
something somewhat similar, but it was gross and in 2.0 - we never used it
in prod.
Is the proxy-timeout for the entire request to be returned, the first byte,
or just an i/o timeout?
--
Brian Akins
On 7/13/2009 at 3:31 PM, in message
1404e5910907131431m42ec4cffwc08caf273b71f...@mail.gmail.com, Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com wrote:
PR#47521 points out that when mod_authnz_ldap has some fatal LDAP
connectivity error, it doesn't allow other AuthBasicProviders to have
a shot at checking the
-Original Message-
From: Brad Nicholes
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 16:58
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: AuthBasicProvider failover and mod_authnz_ldap
authn_alias where the answer should be no? The second issue
is what should authnz_ldap do? Authnz_ldap has already
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 15:29
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_deflate DoS using HEAD
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger,
VF-Group wrote:
I'm confused. Why do this check so
Brian Akins wrote:
Is the proxy-timeout for the entire request to be returned, the first byte,
or just an i/o timeout?
To set a 900ms timeout the code does approximately this:
apr_interval_time_t new_timeout = apr_time_make(0, 900 *
(APR_USEC_PER_SEC/1000));
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Brad Nicholesbnicho...@novell.com wrote:
The question here is given this context, should AUTH_GENERAL_ERROR ==
AUTH_USER_NOT_FOUND? Given this context, the answer is probably yes.
However are there any cases dealing with authn_alias where the answer should
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
All very true. But how about the following patch. It should do no
harm and should solve the issue in at least some cases (I think
in most cases):
Index: modules/filters/mod_deflate.c
+if
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
I'm confused. Why do this check so late, and why does r-bytes_sent
matter? Why does it screw up the protocol if the DEFLATE
All depends on the first brigade that passes mod_deflate. If this brigade
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So +1 to the proposed patch; in fact, +1 on unsetting C-L and treating
HEAD to the same processing as 304.
+1. Since it's a SHOULD not a MUST, we can be pragmatic
with the headers.
That's back to Eric's original patch, isn't it?
--
Nick Kew
Since I have been elected onto the ASF board and don't want to be
criticizing my own reports, I have resigned as chair of the project.
The PMC nominated OtherBill for the post and, after I added a
just-in-time resolution to today's board meeting agenda, I am happy
to report that it was
hi all,
I modified request_rec simply adding a field in request_rec.
Now, I would like get this field in worker.c
My doubt about this is because worker.c manipulates only sockets and doesn't
request_rec object.
How do I do this ??
Thank you
Ricardo
--
View this message in context:
I modified request_rec simply adding a field in
request_rec. Now, I would like get this field
in worker.c
You also wouldn't modify request_rec, adding
a new data member, to add information about a
request anyway. If you wanted to add information
about a request, you would add it to
Ray Morris wrote:
I modified request_rec simply adding a field in
request_rec. Now, I would like get this field
in worker.c
You also wouldn't modify request_rec, adding
a new data member, to add information about a
request anyway. If you wanted to add information
about a
You realize that you could trivially handle most related issues without
changing Apache at all just by prioritizing your backend work, right?
For example, put your higher priority work in a faster server process
than the low priority work.
If your applications are written according to best
Hi,
This is Task university. We have scheduling algorithms for request
priorization (QoS).
But, these algorithms were simulated.
Now, my idea is to implement these algorithms.
Analyze the behavior in production.
Thank you
Ricardo
Houser, Rick wrote:
You realize that you could trivially
I'm trying to use mod_deflate to compress data coming out of tomcat
through mod_jk and need the proper content-length header set for the
COMPRESSED data, but can't do this because the data is streamed and sent
after the headers are set, therefore we don't know the compressed
content-length until
24 matches
Mail list logo
