On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:36:06PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
static apr_status_t base10_strtoff(apr_off_t *offset, const char *buf,
char **endptr)
{
const char *last;
*offset = apr_atoi64(buf);
I think this needs to DTRT with a 32-bit off_t.
How
Hi Rüdiger,
On 08/23/2011 12:25 PM CEST +02:00, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
IMHO the patch does not solve the issue mentioned in the comment
and is not needed.
Keep in mind the difference between ap_matches_request_vhost and
check_host_alias:
ap_matches_request_vhost checks only the
Please update the bug report:
1. Declare the unneeded patch obsolete.
2. Update the needed patch to be against trunk.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Micha Lenk
Sent: Freitag, 9. September 2011 11:30
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: With IP address in Host: header
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:36:06PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
static apr_status_t base10_strtoff(apr_off_t *offset, const char *buf,
char **endptr)
{
const char *last;
*offset =
Hi,
In modules/proxy/ajp_header.c we have:
+++
/* need to figure out how to do this
if (s-secret) {
if (ajp_msg_append_uint8(msg, SC_A_SECRET) ||
ajp_msg_append_string(msg, s-secret)) {
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r-server,
Can anyone formally +1 the 2.2.14 and 2.2.19 patches on this thread
for promotion to apply_to?
I put the 2.0.x patch in 2.0.x/STATUS, as the code needs to be
committed first before being made available as a patch.
Same here…
On Sep 9, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:36:06PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
static apr_status_t base10_strtoff(apr_off_t *offset, const char *buf,
We are v. close to having 2.0 and 2.2 in a tag-able state…
I propose a TR next week and offer to RM.
On 9/9/2011 8:52 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Log:
Looking to tR next week??
I'll tag in 30 minutes. Just going over final status now.
It would be great if you could RM 2.3.x next week; right now those
early adopters don't have a fix in their hands at all.
Patch applied and committed…
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Same here…
On Sep 9, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:36:06PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
static apr_status_t
Sure… no prob.
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/9/2011 8:52 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Log:
Looking to tR next week??
I'll tag in 30 minutes. Just going over final status now.
It would be great if you could RM 2.3.x next week; right now those
early adopters
On 9/9/2011 9:07 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/CHANGES
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/CHANGES?rev=1167184r1=1167183r2=1167184view=diff
==
---
On 9/9/2011 11:04 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
The CVE-2011-3192 page has been changed by wrowe:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/CVE-2011-3192
Edits are now welcome, I'd like to have us publish this advisory
in conjunction with the official 2.2.21 announcement (hopefully)
on Monday.
On 9/9/2011 11:06 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/9/2011 11:04 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
The CVE-2011-3192 page has been changed by wrowe:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/CVE-2011-3192
Edits are now welcome, I'd like to have us publish this advisory
in conjunction with the official 2.2.21
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
which do not yet constitute ASF releases. win32-x86 binary distribution
will follow shortly.
This will be a 72 hour vote, which ends no later than Noon ET Monday
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.21 as GA
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Sep 9 16:04:03 2011
New Revision: 1167266
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1167266view=rev
Log:
Update docco xforms
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/bind.html.de
...
Modified:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:10 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
which do not yet constitute ASF releases. win32-x86 binary distribution
will follow shortly.
This will be a 72 hour vote, which ends no later than Noon ET
17 matches
Mail list logo
