Re: problem with ap_md5 in custom module

2012-08-15 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:13 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all i'm having a problem with ap_md5, i just want to write a custom module that compute che md5 checksum of the requested url and give it back to the user. This is my code:

Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693

2012-08-15 Thread pqf
Hi, all I prefer the following solution, can anyone review it? procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() will be blocked until process manager create a new fcgid process, the worst case is someone else take the new created process before I do, and I have to post another spawn command to PM again. The extreme

Re: svn commit: r1373169 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2012-08-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.08.2012 02:00, traw...@apache.org wrote: Author: trawick Date: Wed Aug 15 00:00:42 2012 New Revision: 1373169 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373169view=rev Log: clarify :) Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS URL:

problem with ap_md5 in custom module

2012-08-15 Thread nik600
Dear all i'm having a problem with ap_md5, i just want to write a custom module that compute che md5 checksum of the requested url and give it back to the user. This is my code: *

Re: Proposed TR for this Friday

2012-08-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote: With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped... I hope she is doing better now. I propose this Friday: Aug 17th. Any conflicts?? You might want to take a look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1241953 Since

Re: How to align shm in an neat way?

2012-08-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 14.08.2012 23:20, Jim Jagielski wrote: slotmem handles this well, afaict ;) The fix applied in r1373270 which Joe also had a look at is very similar to the handling in slotmem. I added some macros as proposed by Joe. Fortunately the code in shmcb already did all the address calculations

Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693

2012-08-15 Thread Lazy
2012/8/15 pqf p...@mailtech.cn: Hi, all I prefer the following solution, can anyone review it? procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() will be blocked until process manager create a new fcgid process, the worst case is someone else take the new created process before I do, and I have to post another spawn

Re: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693

2012-08-15 Thread pqf
Hi, Michal My solution do add availability to each class, which is the procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() call in each loop do. The sleep() call is intrudused for a stress test without warm up time, in this case, mod_fcgid will create more processes than a slow start one(each process handler can't apply