On 03/19/2014 06:15 AM, Andreas B. wrote:
Hello,
I saw the new unix sockets for mod_proxy in 2.4.9 and I am wondering why
there has to be a special url format. Wouldn't it be possible to supply
the socket path as a proxy parameter? I have something like this in mind:
Proxy
On 03/18/2014 02:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to define wildcard workers when the URL is
known to be a regexp substitution?
For these workers' URLs, the dollars (plus the following digit) could
be
On 03/19/2014 09:59 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 03/18/2014 02:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to define wildcard workers when the URL is
known to be a regexp substitution?
For these workers' URLs, the
On 03/19/2014 10:13 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 03/19/2014 09:59 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 03/18/2014 02:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to define wildcard workers when the URL is
known to be a regexp
Hi,
I've submitted a patch set [1] adding SASL support to mod_authn_ldap a while
ago, but the ticket got no feedback. I'd be very thankful for a review and
merge.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55178
Chained to this message are the patches.
Thank you!
Lubo
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.xml | 28 +++
docs/manual/style/scripts/prettify.js | 2 +-
include/util_ldap.h | 4 ++-
modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c | 16 +++--
modules/ldap/util_ldap.c
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.xml | 34 -
docs/manual/style/scripts/prettify.js | 2 +-
include/util_ldap.h | 5 +-
modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c | 14 +-
modules/ldap/util_ldap.c | 94
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
Currently they are used for NoProxy, but could be reusable to ProxyBlock.
Rename them to something more generic.
---
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c | 8
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h | 4 ++--
modules/proxy/proxy_util.c | 24
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
It is nice and could be reused by ProxyBlock.
---
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c | 98 +--
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c b/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
Hi,
I opened a ticket [1] with the patches (chained to this message), but got
virtually
no responsem, therefore I assume it might be a better idea to discuss them in a
list.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56152
I'd very thankful for a review and evenutal merge.
The
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
They do the same task now, so we can remove some duplicate code. They do the
same thing except that ProxyBlock does certain things better -- they support
masked network addresses, thus we can now block subnets.
---
docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml | 14
From: Lubomir Rintel lubo.rin...@gooddata.com
We resolve the names using the configuration parsing, thus we already have the
addresses. It could be redundant for NoProxy, but the same code could be used
with ProxyBlock if it did this.
---
modules/proxy/proxy_util.c | 8
1 file changed,
On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:15 AM, Andreas B. regis...@progandy.de wrote:
Hello,
I saw the new unix sockets for mod_proxy in 2.4.9 and I am wondering why
there has to be a special url format. Wouldn't it be possible to supply the
socket path as a proxy parameter?
It would be. We chose
As I understand it, we require PCRE_DUPNAMES functionality, right?
So I think we need to check for it at configure/build time
and bail if it isn't available.
The configure part is done in
http://svn.apache.org/r1579259
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski Sent: Mittwoch, 19. März 2014 16:37
To: httpd
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1554300 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
include/ap_mmn.h include/ap_regex.h include/http_core.h
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h server/core.c
As noted, from how I understand it, currently we allow it to
build BUT the behavior is not as expected or designed, since
the expected behavior *requires* PCRE_DUPNAMES. If we require
PCRE_DUPNAMES then we require it, right?
On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
Hi Apache developers,
over the time I've accumulated some patches for mod_proxy_html which I
would like to get reviewed, and get applied in SVN (best both, trunk and
then backported to 2.4). This is something that I feel to owe the Apache
httpd community.
So, lets first start with a bug
Hi Apache developers,
next is a bug that causes mod_proxy_html to add some random characters
(+html code) to HTML pages, if the document is smaller than 4 bytes.
(Thomas, Ewald, this is issue #18378 in our Mantis). It looks like the
output is from some kind of uninitialized memory. The added
Just looking for verification here ;)
Thx!
On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
As noted, from how I understand it, currently we allow it to
build BUT the behavior is not as expected or designed, since
the expected behavior *requires* PCRE_DUPNAMES. If we
Hi Apache developers,
the next patch fixes the behavior of mod_proxy_html to remove any
!doctype tags from the beginning of HTML and XHTML documents. (Thomas,
Ewald, this is issue #19803 in our Mantis). This !doctype tag is
needed by some browsers to correctly render XHTML documents.
It's always best, imo, to follow-up with a bugzilla entry with
description and patch.
Thx!!
On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info wrote:
Hi Apache developers,
next is a bug that causes mod_proxy_html to add some random characters (+html
code) to HTML pages, if the
Hi Apache developers,
next is a feature that extends mod_proxy_html to rewrite URLs in CSS
documents too. This is done by applying the configured regex and string
replacements for the content of HTML tags also on whole CSS documents,
i.e. documents with Content-Type: text/css.
The attached
Hi all,
just for the records: I've just filed this in the ASF bugzilla as
issue #56285.
Regards,
Micha
Hi,
Just for the records, I've just filed this issue in ASF bugzilla as
issue #56286.
Regards,
Micha
On 19.03.2014 20:40, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Apache developers,
over the time I've accumulated some patches for mod_proxy_html which I
would like to get reviewed, and get applied in SVN (best
Hi again,
Err, #56287 that is.
Regards,
Micha
On 19.03.2014 22:05, Micha Lenk wrote:
Just for the records, I've just filed this issue in ASF bugzilla as
issue #56286.
Hi,
On 19.03.2014 21:19, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's always best, imo, to follow-up with a bugzilla entry with
description and patch.
Ok, this issue is now filed in ASF bugzilla as #56286.
Regards,
Micha
Hi Apache developers,
In HTML you can have div tags that have a background image by
providing a style attribute. E.g. this can be done by something fancy
like this:
div style=background:url(http://www.example.com/fancy-background.png)
right 0px no-repeat; height:325px;
Currently
Hi developers,
The attached patch fixes a buffer overflow in at least one of the six
string replacement implementations in mod_proxy_html.
Unfortunately I don't remember anymore how to reproduce the issue
properly, but I know that some long time ago I fixed a segfault with
this patch.
The
28 matches
Mail list logo
