On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Here I have the output of just one test t/ssl/pr12355.t - and note the
differences in the ssl_access_log - not just the error messages (I have
removed all debug messages from the logs as they were in the way.
LibreSSL is
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
A longish read - basically while 2.4.12 had few errors when built against
OpenSSL 0.9.8 LibreSSL has quite a few errors - perhaps because it has
removed many unsafe crypto combinations. The root question is: is this
Hello everybody,
I would be very grateful if somebody could look into bug report 58118
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58118
The issue concerns the logging of a 503 status code in
modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c at 836 although a 200 has been sent to
the client. This can happen
First little thing I ran into - that I did not have with 2.4.12 is this:
root@x065:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/test]/opt/httpd/sbin/apachectl start
AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: More than one MPM loaded.
Granted, I should perhaps change to pre-fork (I noticed some had only
tested that) - but
I do not know why both are there - something to do with the configure
statement perhaps. As I said above - not had this show up before.
In any case, just finished ApacheTest and is looking very good.
All tests successful.
Files=110, Tests=4843, 364 wallclock secs ( 3.38 usr 0.50 sys + 88.88
Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page is
up to date...
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Oops. Sorry.
On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Hi all,
since 2.4.10 and 2.2.29 the
refresh your browser cache. :)
On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page is
up to date...
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Oops. Sorry.
On Jul 15,
Oops. Sorry.
On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Hi all,
since 2.4.10 and 2.2.29 the annou...@httpd.apache.org is abandoned. Is this
intentional?
Someone already asked about this last year:
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=141157921203967w=2
If
I see 2.4.16 since yesterday (if I remember correctly). Are you talking
about http://httpd.apache.org/ ?
b.
On 16 July 2015 at 14:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page
is up to date...
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47
I am a bit behind - yet looking forward.
I wish to recall a pleasant get together last April in Texas just before
ApacheCon. At that time I mentioned LibreSSL and building httpd against it
(actually mod_ssl is all it amounts to).
The build itself was quite simple - I shall repeat that now for
Should have thought of that earlier :p @ me.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
refresh your browser cache. :)
On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page
Am 16.07.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Michael Felt:
First little thing I ran into - that I did not have with 2.4.12 is this:
root@x065:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/test]/opt/httpd/sbin/apachectl start
AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: More than one MPM loaded.
Granted, I should perhaps change to
My comment is that with 2.4.12 the same configure did not do this. This is
new behavior.
I was testing with 2.4.12 all day yesterday, using the same build scripts
today with 2.4.16 came up differently.
So now, after the build I have this difference in httpd.conf
On Jul 16, 2015 8:04 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
First little thing I ran into - that I did not have with 2.4.12 is this:
root@x065:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/test]/opt/httpd/sbin/apachectl start
AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: More than one MPM loaded.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
My comment is that with 2.4.12 the same configure did not do this. This is
new behavior.
Probably a consequence of [1] which may not play very well with
--enable-load-all-modules.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1661848
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1661848
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
Looks like it was explicitly changed to track mpms like any other shared
module, and as Bill noted, --enable-load-all-modules simply loaded them
all mpms included.
Andy
On
Yes, and with --enable-load-all-modules (not so common, I think, when
not testing with the framework...).
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Yeah... gr.
In any case, this would affect only those w/ virgin builds, right?
On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:01 AM,
Nothing serious of course - AND the advantage is that I do not have to do a
new build to switch to pre-fork (which was the old way iirc).
So - was I the first to find a bug in the new release :P
btw - I am much more interested in the ssl tests and whether it is a failed
test (going back to MC4
I really should have titled this differently - sigh!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a bit behind - yet looking forward.
I wish to recall a pleasant get together last April in Texas just before
ApacheCon. At that time I mentioned LibreSSL and
Yeah... gr.
In any case, this would affect only those w/ virgin builds, right?
On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
My comment is that with 2.4.12 the same configure did not do this.
Testing as we speak... will commit if all OK :)
On Jul 15, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de
wrote:
...got the test framework to PASS on my OS X against httpd/trunk built.
I added more description of what I found in the README and checked that in. I
have
Moving this to a thread with a better title!
A longish read - basically while 2.4.12 had few errors when built
against OpenSSL 0.9.8 LibreSSL has quite a few errors - perhaps because
it has removed many unsafe crypto combinations. The root question is:
is this LibreSSL misbehaving, or are the
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache httpd 2.2.31, can be found
in;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.31 GA (apr 1.5.2, apr-util 1.5.4)
My own vote after preparing
With 4/5 of the 2.2.30 voters having re-reviewed 2.2.31, and the single
s/-1/+1/ based on this re-roll, I'm confident in calling this vote a
success,
and am pushing this release to the mirrors for announcement tomorrow.
Thanks all for all the reviews of both 2.2 candidates (and all of the 4 2.4
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
btw - I am much more interested in the ssl tests and whether it is a failed
test (going back to MC4 128-bit) when the initial connection was much
better. I assume this is not logjam (or some other horrible recent OpenSSL
Am 16.07.2015 um 17:26 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
Yes, and with --enable-load-all-modules (not so common, I think, when
not testing with the framework...).
Exactly, thats mostly a flag to produce non-production bus test ready
configs. Not so nice that it doesn't startup, but I would be astonished
Thanks, Jim!
Am 16.07.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
Testing as we speak... will commit if all OK :)
On Jul 15, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de
wrote:
...got the test framework to PASS on my OS X against httpd/trunk built.
I
I'll look at it and hopefully understand something. but tomorrow.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Here I have the output of just one test t/ssl/pr12355.t - and note the
28 matches
Mail list logo
