On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>>
>> I adjusted the test case to cope with a sed which adds a trailing
>> newline now, does that pass with OS X sed? I'm yet to work out why the
>> test cases passes in trunk and fa
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>>
>> I adjusted the test case to cope with a sed which adds a trailing
>> newline now, does that pass with OS X sed? I'm yet to work out why the
>> test cases passes in trunk and fa
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:03:23PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> System APR does require the -devel package. That RHEL package aught to
> install the .m4 logic required by httpd, but it is on us to find that in a
> conventional place.
>
I think this should be handled in the buildconf script. T
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 19:58
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1773865 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:05:32AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Joe, did you forget an svn add? I see no ext_filter/ subdirectory on trunk;
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/htdocs/modules/filter/
Oops :( Added now, sorry guys.
2016-12-14 18:53 GMT+01:00 Jacob Champion :
> On 12/14/2016 09:33 AM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
>> The current public filter documentation at [1] (which is old, but still
>> the only overall documentation I'm aware of) says
>>
>
> Forgot the link, sorry.
>
> [1] https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/d
From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
all my tests show no regressions...
Let's shoot for a T&R this (east coast) evening... how does
that sound?
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Looking at a T&R of 2.4.24 either the 15th or 16th...
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
> all my tests show no regressions...
>
> Let's shoot for a T&R this (east coast) evening... how does
> that sound?
+1 & thanks
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
+1 and *many* thanks!
> Am 15.12.2016 um 16:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
> all my tests show no regressions...
>
> Let's shoot for a T&R this (east coast) evening... how does
> that sound?
>
>> On Dec 14, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wro
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:05:32AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > Joe, did you forget an svn add? I see no ext_filter/ subdirectory on
> trunk;
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/framework/
> trunk/t/htdocs/modules/filter/
I have been looking at this area a little bit from the perspective of
killing the keepalive conns as early as possible during graceful
process exit.
This might have had a bad interaction with the event wakeup patch
here. Now we can sit in poll() for significant time after graceful
shutdown is sig
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
>> all my tests show no regressions...
>>
>> Let's shoot for a T&R this (east coast) evening... how does
>> that sound?
>
>
> +1 &
On 12/15/2016 08:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
>>> all my tests show no regressions...
>>>
>>> Let's shoot for a T&R this (east
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I have been looking at this area a little bit from the perspective of
> killing the keepalive conns as early as possible during graceful
> process exit.
>
> This might have had a bad interaction with the event wakeup patch
> here.
Hmm, the wa
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hmm, the wakeup patch isn't in 2.4.24/x already no? (not proposed, by
> me at least, too much changes in events already...).
You're right, my bad. I will followup in the release thread that it's
a red herring.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> From what I can see, there are no show-stoppers and
>>> all my tests show no regressions...
>>>
>>> Let's shoot for a T&R thi
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> If we want to kill keepalive connections early on restart/shutdown I'd rather
> :
>
> Index: server/mpm/event/event.c
> ===
> --- server/mpm/event/event.c(revision 1774260)
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> If we want to kill keepalive connections early on restart/shutdown I'd
>> rather :
>>
>> Index: server/mpm/event/event.c
>> ==
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> Hmm, the wakeup patch isn't in 2.4.24/x already no? (not proposed, by
>> me at least, too much changes in events already...).
>
>
> You're right, my bad. I will followup in the release t
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Ah ok, so you did not reproduced this with vanilla 2.4.x, right?
Right, I was on trunk and had just assumed this was backported (I knew
the sf stuff was).
>
> BTW, I had issues while testing both sf's changes (now in 2.4.x), the
> wakeup ones
Actually, it is.
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1772334
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> I have been looking at this area a little bit from the perspective of
>> killing the keepalive conns a
Actually, it is:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1772334
So I would like to see the enhancement in:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03a360e5214052b38752d10a75f864e59d518cd6ac8ddbbcefe91c18@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E
applied to trunk and then proposed for backp
Done and done.
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Actually, it is:
>
>https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1772334
>
> So I would like to see the enhancement in:
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03a360e5214052b38752d10a75f864e59d518cd6ac8
I'll give it until tomorrow AM... If we have the 3, it'll be
folded in. If not, I'm not going to delay.
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Done and done.
>
>> On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Actually, it is:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?v
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Done and done.
Will voted it, but I don't think it's necessary for 2.4.24 (not
harmful though, possibly useless).
>
>> On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Actually, it is:
>>
>>https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=re
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Done and done.
>
> Will voted it
I meant "will vote" in this typo, not veto ;)
Maybe Eric with an easy reproducer could confirm, but unless poll()
consistently return EINTR I don't s
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:32 PM, wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Thu Dec 15 21:32:50 2016
> New Revision: 1774525
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1774525&view=rev
> Log:
> kill the keepalive conns as early as possible during graceful
> process exit.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/s
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:10 AM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Dec 16 00:10:40 2016
> New Revision: 1774544
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1774544&view=rev
> Log:
> Propose.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> UR
28 matches
Mail list logo
