G/A
Rain, so went in search of something to do.
The attached patch is proof(?) C89 can still work with the big stuff at
least; compiles all the needed bits of PCRE 10.22 and only finds one
(cast) error which I think other compilers will whinge/warn about also.
AFAIK PCRE is no longer a supplie
Am 01.02.2017 um 06:36 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Stefan,
did not have the time to look at it really. Will do, but very busy right now.
Thanks - no problem.
Am 31.01.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
:
Hi Yann,
Hi Stefan,
any ideas?
Stefan
Am 27.01.2017 um 20:30 schrie
Stefan,
did not have the time to look at it really. Will do, but very busy right now.
> Am 31.01.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> :
>
> Hi Yann,
> Hi Stefan,
>
> any ideas?
>
> Stefan
>
>> Am 27.01.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
>>
>>
>>> On 01/27/2017 08:10 PM
On 01/30/2017 06:23 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
You could also configure buildbot to detect any new compiler warnings.
That'll cause buildbot to report a FAILURE (red) or a WARNING (yellow),
instead of a SUCCESS (green), if the build succeeded but a compiler
warning has been issued.
Good suggestio
On 01/30/2017 05:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I'm tremendously inspired by this work. What are your thoughts on the
idea of having a series of docker container builds that compile and run
the test suite on various distributions? I'll volunteer to give this a
whack since it's something that's been
Hi Yann,
Hi Stefan,
any ideas?
Stefan
Am 27.01.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
>
>
> On 01/27/2017 08:10 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Hi Yann,
>>
>> this is now a segfault with mod_http2 + beam v4 patch + mpm v7 patch:
>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentati
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 10:42
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1773397 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
> modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Er
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> I have a fix but not sure if the change should just be reverted. In
> the PR, the user changed the 2.2 config to make the ProxyPass within
> location and expected similar behavior.
>
> Should have probably just told them that exceptio