Re: backports

2022-03-04 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> A question: Would it be easier for all this if we moved to being Github >> canon? > > I think it is much more straightforward. The original work, reviews > and travis results are

Re: svn commit: r1898566 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/cache/ modules/dav/fs/ modules/dav/lock/ modules/mappers/ modules/proxy/

2022-03-04 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 04.03.2022 um 08:32 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/3/22 5:40 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> On 3/3/22 4:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote: Folks (in no way pointing a finger at Jim who just did merging duty), it is not

Re: svn commit: r1898586 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ changes-entries/pr65881.txt modules/http2/h2_request.c test/modules/http2/env.py test/modules/http2/htdocs/cgi/hello.py test/modules/http2

2022-03-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 3/4/22 9:51 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote: > Author: icing > Date: Fri Mar 4 08:51:47 2022 > New Revision: 1898586 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898586=rev > Log: > merge of 1898146,1898173 from trunk: > > *) mod_http2: preserve the port number given in a HTTP/1.1 >

Re: svn commit: r1898586 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ changes-entries/pr65881.txt modules/http2/h2_request.c test/modules/http2/env.py test/modules/http2/htdocs/cgi/hello.py test/modules/http2

2022-03-04 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 04.03.2022 um 10:22 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/4/22 9:51 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: icing >> Date: Fri Mar 4 08:51:47 2022 >> New Revision: 1898586 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898586=rev >> Log: >> merge of 1898146,1898173 from trunk: >> >> *)

Re: svn commit: r1898566 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/cache/ modules/dav/fs/ modules/dav/lock/ modules/mappers/ modules/proxy/

2022-03-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 3/4/22 9:24 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 04.03.2022 um 08:32 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >> >> >> >> On 3/3/22 5:40 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 3/3/22 4:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > Folks (in no way pointing a finger

Re: svn commit: r1898566 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/cache/ modules/dav/fs/ modules/dav/lock/ modules/mappers/ modules/proxy/

2022-03-04 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 04.03.2022 um 09:46 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/4/22 9:24 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> >>> Am 04.03.2022 um 08:32 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/3/22 5:40 PM, Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On

Re: svn commit: r1898586 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ changes-entries/pr65881.txt modules/http2/h2_request.c test/modules/http2/env.py test/modules/http2/htdocs/cgi/hello.py test/modules/http2

2022-03-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 3/4/22 10:50 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 04.03.2022 um 10:22 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >> >> >> >> On 3/4/22 9:51 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: icing >>> Date: Fri Mar 4 08:51:47 2022 >>> New Revision: 1898586 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898586=rev >>>

Re: svn commit: r1898586 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ changes-entries/pr65881.txt modules/http2/h2_request.c test/modules/http2/env.py test/modules/http2/htdocs/cgi/hello.py test/modules/http2

2022-03-04 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 04.03.2022 um 11:09 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/4/22 10:50 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> >>> Am 04.03.2022 um 10:22 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/4/22 9:51 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote: Author: icing Date: Fri Mar 4 08:51:47 2022 New

backports

2022-03-04 Thread Stefan Eissing
We should improve our backport procedure and provide guidance on how to use it after the next release. Post-mortem dbm backport: - the patch pointed to the in 2.4.x/STATUS was incomplete, lacking APLOGNO() - the incomplete patch was voted on and accepted, as local tests do not have the full CI

Re: backports

2022-03-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
A question: Would it be easier for all this if we moved to being Github canon? > On Mar 4, 2022, at 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > We should improve our backport procedure and provide guidance on how to use > it after the next release. > > Post-mortem dbm backport: > - the patch pointed

Re: backports

2022-03-04 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > A question: Would it be easier for all this if we moved to being Github canon? I think it is much more straightforward. The original work, reviews and travis results are all in the same place and nothing is copied around. I have had the