Re: h2 worker pool -> mpm worker pool

> Am 10.07.2022 um 18:56 schrieb Ivan Zhakov : > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 11:24, Stefan Eissing wrote: > I would like to move the h2 worker pool into the mpm at some time in the > future. To be available on systems with threads and non-prefork > configurations. > > The main motivation for

Re: [PATCH] Rewrite ap_regexec() without using thread-local storage and malloc()/free() (was: Issues with shipping apr_thread_current() in APR 1.8.0 and an alternative approach for PCRE2 allocations i

On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:15, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 20:14, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > > > > > > I think that we could try an alternative approach for that part of > > > > > the problem. The alternative approach would have the same > > > > > characteristics as the approach

Re: h2 worker pool -> mpm worker pool

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 10:17, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > > Am 10.07.2022 um 18:56 schrieb Ivan Zhakov : > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 at 11:24, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > I would like to move the h2 worker pool into the mpm at some time in the > future. To be available on systems with threads and