I was trying to use --with-z=/path but without this patch the check
for the library didn't add -I/path and so didn't compile.
Even with this patch, the check for zutil.h. Clearly (from
config.log) my path is not being searched.
Perhaps there is a better change that makes both tests work?
Ben Laurie wrote:
This patch removes some magic in request.c. I wrote it coz 2.0.28 didn't
actually work at all for me, coz the magic failed.
+1; this patch is a lot less cryptic than the current logic
Somehow the magic was OK again in the snapshot I tried, but I consider
it a bad thing that
(btw, the whole directory walk I find completely unreadable, I ought to do something
about
it).
+1, readability is a good thing.
Bill
This patch removes some magic in request.c. I wrote it coz 2.0.28 didn't
actually work at all for me, coz the magic failed.
Somehow the magic was OK again in the snapshot I tried, but I consider
it a bad thing that it exists at all (btw, the whole directory walk I
find completely unreadable, I
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:31:18AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I was trying to use --with-z=/path but without this patch the check
for the library didn't add -I/path and so didn't compile.
snip, snip
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
This patch removes some magic in request.c. I wrote it coz 2.0.28 didn't
actually work at all for me, coz the magic failed.
++1. Clarity doesn't have to be inconsistent with optimization.
In my defense, what existing before was even less legible - I sincerely
tryed to improve it before the
