Here is the test-cvs mailing list archive
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-test-cvs
They also have the test-dev archive:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-test-dev
Enjoy!
_
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
I've started looking closely into Apache::Test perl-framework,
inspired by Geoffrey's brief introduction for its sample usage in
Apache::Clean.
Sorry Tatsuhiko, this email seemed to fall between chairs :(
Well, Apache::Test looks really cool, providing me sophisticated
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
At Sat, 09 Mar 2002 13:16:28 +0800,
Stas Bekman wrote:
Well, (at least now) as for my web application testing, I don't
like to use Apache::Test(Util|Request)? Because:
1) I love to do testing with Test::More's utility functions. I'd
just get accustomed to it.
At Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:03:36 +0800,
Stas Bekman wrote:
That's the exact point where we don't agree with each other, IMO. I
like to make combination of Simple modules, and don't like All in
One package. (Well, Test::More is going into core from perl-5.7, and
even before 5.6 it's very easy
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
*) make simple fault-tolerance with dns-balanced backends.
mod_proxy does this already.
No. mod_proxy tries it but code is broken. If connection failed it try
to connect with the same socket. It should make new
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 March 2002 08:57
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:54:01AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:20:23PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
Should we bump the copyright year on all the files?
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
Should we bump the copyright year on all the files?
Anyone have a script handy?
find . -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|2000-2001|2000-2002|' {} \;
Would be nicer to have a more 'correct' stript which would be ran once a
server/main.c:578
/* This is a hack until we finish the code so that it only reads
* the config file once and just operates on the tree already in
* memory. rbb
*/
What's the status on this?
Sander
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 March 2002 15:04
trawick 02/03/09 06:04:11
Modified:modules/proxy mod_proxy.c
Log:
provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
This seems like a
Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
When I build Apache like so:
./configure --prefix=/opt/local/apache2 --enable-proxy --enable-cache
It fails like so:
prefork.c: In function `prefork_pre_config':
prefork.c:1221: `APR_PROC_DETACH_FOREGROUND' undeclared (first use in
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:47:13PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
credit where it is deserved. I do *not* think we owe the user
community a project plan and schedule of deliverables.
I think we owe it to the other developers to have a project
plan and a
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:47:13PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
credit where it is deserved. I do *not* think we owe the user
community a project plan and schedule of deliverables.
I think we owe it to the other developers to have a
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:34:58AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Putting absolute paths in the config file is a Bad Idea. Using
relatives, the entire Apache install location can be self-contained
and easily moved by changing one line.
How would you deal with:
./configure --prefix=/opt/apache
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:12:39PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Let me clarify: By putting absolute paths into the config
files, we are locking the installation into a single location.
By using ServerRoot-relative locations, as we always
Brian Pane wrote:
Thus I view the
finalization of the APIs and design changes (based on what
we've communicated in STATUS) as the most important next step,
followed by getting the 2.0 GA released.
I agree. Modules won't be ported en mass to 2.0 until module writers
and maintainers have
At 10:07 AM -0800 3/9/02, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:34:58AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Putting absolute paths in the config file is a Bad Idea. Using
relatives, the entire Apache install location can be self-contained
and easily moved by changing one line.
How would
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:04:49PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I must be misunderstanding the debate. Obviously for those that
use config.layout layouts, then they will require that their httpd.conf
file match with how things were build. Is the question then should
configure build an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
Thanks - found it while I was on the plane earlier this morning, but
could not get anywhere near a net connection till now.
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a note to let everyone know that the first pass of conversion of the
module docs to xml is complete. This was accomplished with the help of Rich
Bowen, Brad Miller, and Patrik Grip-Jansson.
There is still lots of fine tuning to be done, but I believe what we have
now is much more
19 matches
Mail list logo
