On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:48:15AM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
Here's a snippet from 1.3 INSTALL file:
Note: To reduce the pollution of shared installation locations
(like /usr/local/ or /etc) with Apache files to a minimum the
string ``/apache'' is
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:16:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
We shouldn't ever be installing apr or apr-util as part of flood. Ideally
we will depend on an already-installed version of flood, be that in some
standard location or not. Some work has been done lately to make apr
and apr-util
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:30:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:16:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
We shouldn't ever be installing apr or apr-util as part of flood. Ideally
we will depend on an already-installed version of flood, be that in some
standard
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:29:09 -0700
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm fine with bundling it
for now, but as soon as apr and apr-util can be installed on their
own we stop bundling it.
So for now let us have /usr/local/flood as default prefix, but we will
change that to
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
So for now let us have /usr/local/flood as default prefix, but we will
change that to /usr/local as soon as we get rid of APR/APR-util. Makes
sense?
+1 :)
To me having bundled apr and apr-util just
makes everything way more
I tried to recreate this problem, but no luck so far...
is there any particular type of request that I need to
use to trigger the memory leak? I just ran a few hundred
thousand requests for the same 1KB file through 2.0.41-pre2
with the mod_mem_cache settings below, and I can't see
any sign of
Hi,
Comment inline on 2 emails.
--On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM -0700 Jon Travis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote:
While we believe that the El-Kabong codebase is a valuable contribution
that we would like to pick up, we also
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Kris Verbeeck wrote:
The response:
HTTP/1.0 200
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:45:39 GMT
Server: web server
Connection: close
etag: b9829-2269-3cd12aa1
Another bug - why is an HTTP/1.1 response
Kris,
I am in the process of adding virtual host info into the key
generation too. I'll include your work with mine if that's okay.
Paul J. Reder
Kris Verbeeck wrote:
Hi,
Some of our QA people discovered a problem when performing request
with a query string on a mod_cache enabled Apache
I tried to recreate this problem, but no luck so far...
Same here. I was able to see an EOS bucket leak in 2.0.40 that is fixed in
the latest tag.
Bill
--On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:55 PM -0700 Jon Travis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote:
While we believe that the El-Kabong codebase is a valuable contribution
that we would like to pick up, we also recognize the possibility that
Which values are youusing for MaxRequestsPerChild.
If mine is different than 0, then nice, I don't see a leak because
each of my Threads are kill once in a while.
But if it is = 0, then it leaks when refreshing entries in the cache,
could it be the fact in NetWare we have one process and
I am using WebBench to run my test.
Request are not using keep alive.
There are a wide range of files (.ex, .html and .gif and 404s)
It leaks, whatever if I am requesting only few files or the whole 6000+
set of files.
The leak depend on the number of clients I am using, with 40 clients
and a
Kris,
Thank you for your contribution.
I committed the patch to mod_cache.c. Paul Reder is doing some work in the
code to generate the search key and will incorporate your patch when he is
complete.
Bill
Hi,
Some of our QA people discovered a problem when performing request
with a query
Do you see the leak when repeatedly requesting one file with one client?
Bill
I am using WebBench to run my test.
Request are not using keep alive.
There are a wide range of files (.ex, .html and .gif and 404s)
It leaks, whatever if I am requesting only few files or the whole 6000+
set of
Kris Verbeeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apr_status_t cache_generate_key_default( request_rec *r, apr_pool_t*p,
char**key )
{
- *key = apr_pstrdup(p,r-uri);
+ *key = apr_pstrcat(p,r-uri, ?, r-args, NULL);
return APR_SUCCESS;
}
Hm... This should be something like:
If (r-args) {
Yes, I believe it should check r-args. I don't think you are stupid,
severely or otherwise... ;)
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Kris Verbeeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apr_status_t cache_generate_key_default( request_rec *r, apr_pool_t*p,
char**key )
{
- *key = apr_pstrdup(p,r-uri);
+ *key =
There is a nasty bit of cruft still left in mod_mem_cache regarding use of
the apr_atomic functions. There is a magic macro called USE_ATOMICS defined
in mod_cache.h that should be turned into an APR feature macro. If the
apr_atomic operators are not implemented properly on Netware, then all
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
| Your points about Jon's contributions are all absolutely true. I agree. But
| commit access is not a simple, wow. great code. give him commit privs.
|
| Suffice it to say that this issue is quite a bit more complex than that,
| thus the reason it took a
Paul J. Reder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I believe it should check r-args. I don't think you are stupid,
severely or otherwise... ;)
That's what _you_ think... Others (like me) tend to disagree! :)
After thinking about it, it wouldn't really matter, because apr_pstrcat will
already stop
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 03:47:58 -0700, Paul J. Reder wrote:
Yes, I believe it should check r-args. I don't think you are stupid,
severely or otherwise... ;)
it should not make a difference really
if r-args is null than the strcat should terminate there anyway ;-)
on another note..
Paul.. I'm
But I'm also factoring the hostname into key creation, which
also might be NULL. So even if the args issue could be ignored, the
hostname can't (or at least the possibility of 1 out of 2 NULL
can't be ignored).
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Paul J. Reder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I believe it
Ian Holsman wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 03:47:58 -0700, Paul J. Reder wrote:
Yes, I believe it should check r-args. I don't think you are stupid,
severely or otherwise... ;)
it should not make a difference really
if r-args is null than the strcat should terminate there anyway ;-)
on
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:50:40AM -0500, Jenkins, David wrote:
[snip]
my 2.5 cents
David J
Sorry to post out of the blue on this but the last few messages really
struck a chord.
No reason to apologize, all comments are welcome.
-aaron
Ian Holsman wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 03:47:58 -0700, Paul J. Reder wrote:
Yes, I believe it should check r-args. I don't think you are stupid,
severely or otherwise... ;)
it should not make a difference really
if r-args is null than the strcat should terminate there anyway ;-)
Yes, and No:
Test #1- 1 client, 1 small file (GIF 223 b.), the rate is around 60
req/sec
tested for about half an hour and APR memory stay stable.
Test #2- 1 client, 1 big file (EX, 541Kb), the rate is around 20
req/sec
tested for about 20 min and APR increase by around 8 MB/min.
I think I
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
--On Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:50 AM -0500 Jenkins, David
I disagree almost completely. If you are truly dedicated to the ASF
community, you will understand the cautiousness necessary in deciding
who has commit privs.
I was mainly
Using the atomic test, we do past all of them.
Is it enough or there are other actions that should be taken?
I ran another test requesting the same single small file (GIF, 223
bytes) from 5 clients
instead of 1. rate is at 275 req/sec.
It looks like it is leaking at a 1 MB/5 min rate.
JJ
Apologies if this is the wrong forum for this
I have a client that needs a simple custom apache module developed.
Rather than trying to remember C, I thought it best to offer the
apache developers a few days paid work.
The module needed is simply to take the remote and local IP
address and
Apologies if this is the wrong forum for this
I don't think anyone on this list will object to hearing about real
opportunities to do on-topic work for hire. Head hunter fishing expeditions
would be another matter entirely.
Bill (who has enough work in my day job)
What are you using to determine the amount of leaked memory?
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Using the atomic test, we do past all of them.
Is it enough or there are other actions that should be taken?
I ran another test requesting the same single small file (GIF, 223
bytes) from 5 clients
In NetWare we have an application called Monitor where we could
tract the allocated memory for each loaded module:
APRLIB is always climbing,
APACHE2, MOD_CACHE and MEM_CACHE are stable.
I am just using a clock and Monitor.
JJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/12/02 12:36PM
What are you using to
Hi all there,
I was reading all the stuff related to the E-K parser and may be I have
something to say. I've been using Apache for quite a long time, developing
my own modules mostly, and althought I think the quality of the program is
superb (I have to choose a http server to work with
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:56:12AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch
in the main distribution ?
Doesn't mod_headers give you what you need, at least for Apache 2?
Doesn't look like request headers are handled by Apache 1.3 mod_headers
though.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_headers.html
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Apologies if this is the wrong forum for this
I have a client
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:56:12 -0700, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch
in the main distribution ?
What
Hi,
probably a stupid question, but I'm too lazy to look through the source;
and I'm sure many of you here can answere this question at once:
are the server-side vars generated by the server or only echoed vars which where
provided by the browser??
specially REQUEST_URI is of interest for me
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:31:50PM +0200, Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
probably a stupid question, but I'm too lazy to look through the source;
and I'm sure many of you here can answere this question at once:
are the server-side vars generated by the server or only echoed vars which where
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:08:47PM -0700, Joshua Slive wrote:
If we are staying with the auth rewrite, I think we need to get some docs
for it right away. There was already a posting on the users@httpd list
from someone who needed to run bleeding-edge cvs (for subversion) but
couldn't get
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:08:47PM -0700, Joshua Slive wrote:
If we are staying with the auth rewrite, I think we need to get some docs
for it right away. There was already a posting on the users@httpd list
from someone who needed to run bleeding-edge cvs (for subversion) but
couldn't get
Why will I wouldn't see my allocated memory decrease if it has been
freed?
JJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/12/02 04:19PM
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:16:35PM -0600, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Memory in Apache never shrinks.
Is this a true statement?
When reaching a cruising state (stable load, same
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:26:02PM -0600, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Why will I wouldn't see my allocated memory decrease if it has been
freed?
That's just how unix works. When malloc() needs more memory it calls
brk or sbrk to move the heap marker up and to map a new page. There's
no way to
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:26:02PM -0600, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Why will I wouldn't see my allocated memory decrease if it has been
freed?
That's just how unix works. When malloc() needs more memory it calls
brk or sbrk to move the heap
It is my pleasure to announce that Mod_Python has been donated to the
Apache Software Foundation, and is now a subproject of the httpd server
project (see http://httpd.apache.org/).
I am grateful to ASF for accepting this donation and committing resources
to further the support of Mod_Python. I
Let me be the first to say, in the fashion that the Internet has taught
us to celebrate a great victory or other action
Woot.
Mike
--
Michael C. Neel
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:35:19AM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Incorrect, you can pass negative values to sbrk (malloc
implementations use this seldomly) or allocators call munmap
to give pages back to the operating system. Either way, it
is possible that memory usage
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:54:10AM -0400, Dale Ghent wrote:
...
It would be nice if the ASF policies regarding code donations (be it a
2-line patch or a whole suite such as E-K) were posted publicly. The
policy page can cover the process for accepting, privelages (if any) that
may result, as
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:23:02AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This is what I came up so far, but I've hit a problem along the way. No
matter what I do (or should I say, whatever I tried to do so far :-),
the number of input bytes is zero (HTTP/1.1) or not even calculated
(HTTP/1.0). The
Aight, so since this has moved elsewhere, I thought I'd tell
the people who may have initially been interested in the
code.
You can now grab it here: http://ekhtml.sf.net
Should be handy for creating Apache filters that want to mangle
content before shipping it to the browser.
-- Jon
hi,
There are only 10 types of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.
There's also a T-Shirt for this
http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/apparel/5aa9.shtml
-daniel
51 matches
Mail list logo
