--On Friday, January 17, 2003 9:59 AM +0200 Graham Leggett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were to change mod_auth_ldap to use the new authz/authn system
in v2.1, I have to split mod_auth_ldap into mod_authn_ldap (the
is-password-correct part) and mod_authz_ldap (group-membership
part). Am I
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:36:58PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Consider this mod_cgi script:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
print Content-type: text/plain\n\n;
print no_such_func();
print Shouldn't be printed;
httpd.conf:
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/httpd/2.0/perl/
The error is correctly logged:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No, you don't *have* to split them into different modules. One module
could register for both authn/authz providers. The only reason we split
was because their wasn't a lot of shared code between the other auth
modules. I think mod_auth_ldap has a lot of shared
All (or most) of the shared code is in mod_ldap already. It should be
relatively easy to split mod_auth_ldap into mod_authn_ldap and
mod_authz_ldap.
Perhaps we need to go into the terminilogy that modules which have no
handlers (except init, etc) or no directives are called something like
+1 for splitting auth_ldap into authz/authn. We will be releasing our
mod_edir module that provides an alternative authorization service for
auth_ldap. It relies on mod_auth_ldap for authentication and then
enforces access control through mod_edir. It it currently implemented
by adding an
That is correct behaviour to send a 200 since the HTTP headers are complete.
It's always been this way.
I am working on a modification to mod_cgi so a module can register a special
output_and_stderr filter, parse stderr, and can send a 500 if it deems necessary.
-Original Message-
Hi all,
while someone has take care that the main directory at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/
displays all filenames complete, there are almost all longer filenames of the binaries
truncated; f.e.:
http://nagoya.apache.org/mirror/httpd/binaries/linux/
Graham Leggett wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No, you don't *have* to split them into different modules. One
module could register for both authn/authz providers. The only
reason we split was because their wasn't a lot of shared code between
the other auth modules. I think mod_auth_ldap
+1
At 9:42 AM -0500 1/16/03, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I can certainly understand that :) Here is a new patch along those lines.
Index: main/http_main.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/http_main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.599
Hi,
is it possible that we can get also snapshots of apr-iconv at:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/
??
and in addition it would be fine if we could have both the stable and the dev tree as
snapshots;
currently since teh trees where splitted there's only a snapshot of the 2.1 dev tree...
Is it possible to run Apache on a named port such as http://www.moo.org:cow
with TCPMUX?
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Hi,
I read the discussion for few messages, i am not an apache developper,
so i will speak as a user. IMHO, Splitting into two modules will make
auth more complex. actually, it's not really easy to setup, and the
documentation is not always up to date.
regards
Matthieu
Bill Stoddard wrote:
you definitely da bomb!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 2003/01/17 11:04:37
Modified:include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
Log:
Bump for the tag.
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:11 PM
you definitely da bomb!
Good or bad? ;)
Sander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 2003/01/17 11:04:37
Modified:include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
Log:
Bump for the tag.
Sander Striker wrote:
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:11 PM
you definitely da bomb!
Good or bad? ;)
I meant it as a compliment, of course!
(everything I know I learned from my 11-year-old daughter,
so beware)
Tagged Januari 17? :-)
- Dmitri.
On 17 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 2003/01/17 11:07:31
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
Log:
Bump after the tag.
Revision ChangesPath
From: Dmitri Tikhonov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:53 PM
Tagged Januari 17? :-)
*sigh*
Yeah, that's how you spell it in The Netherlands.
Fix comming up, although I might aswell roll it first...
Sander
Hi,
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
ASAP.
Thanks,
Sander
Sander Striker wrote:
I just tagged STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE3. I think this is going to be
our .44. It would be nice to give it one more day on daedalus
and get some +1s on it.
+1 for release as 2.0.44, and thanks for your efforts.
Greg
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:36 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider this mod_cgi script:
# !/usr/bin/perl -w
print Content-type: text/plain\n\n;
print no_such_func();
print Shouldn't be printed;
httpd.conf:
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/
I am also getting this error. Do you know how to solve the problem?
thanks,
Miha
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After starting the server for many times I've received:
[Tue Jan 14 15:55:36 2003] [emerg] (28)No space
* Sander Striker wrote:
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
Didn't test it at the moment, but I guess, the CHANGES file should not
contain 2.0.45 changes... ;-)
nd
--
If God intended people to be
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
let me know, I'll upgrade my
* Stas Bekman wrote:
It shows that I haven't run mod_cgi for ages. I was just used to having
this as a failure (500) under mod_perl. Any reason for not checking the
return status?
hmm, performance? memory usage? What about a script that throws out a lot
of data (say, 1 MB, multiplied with
Hello,
I have a connection filter of type AP_FTYPE_NETWORK which gets called
just before the core output filter. I have placed it here to get at
(read only) the raw output of the server for a given request. The
problem that I am facing is that when my filter callback gets called,
there is no
* Stas Bekman wrote:
What I was missing is the error message attached to the end of the normal
output to indicate that there was a problem (better late than never).
e.g. the following script:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
print Content-type: text/plain\n\n;
print Should be printed;
print
At 08:24 PM 1/17/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2003/01/17 18:24:46
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH Makefile.win
Log:
Damned... this was broken but, since most of us build from .dsp files,
it was never noted. I intend to package this patch into the Win32 .zip
27 matches
Mail list logo
