AddDescription has some unfortunate behavior in matching file names:
File is a file extension, partial filename, wild-card expression or
full filename for files to describe.
Which is it? In fact there is no way to tell mod_autoindex what the
user intends, and some obvious desires cannot be
Can somebody get an example like the following to work?
AddDescription The planet Mars /web/pics/mars.gif
(where /web/pics/mars.gif is a full path?)
Use any version of Apache after 1.3.9 :)
(I haven't actually tried Apache 1.3.9, but some of the confusing code
was introduced in 1.3.9.)
Hi.
We spoke long time about filtering in apache 1.3.
So far, I decided to write mod_blanks as a filter for
apache 2.x, even if I wrote a large part for apache
1.3 (ill port everything):)
Anyway,any suggestion on some modules for apache 2.x
that filter the output (I need to modify the html).
Anyway,any suggestion on some modules for apache 2.x
that filter the output (I need to modify the html).
Perhaps you can use mod_injection as a good starting point.
http://pmade.org/pjones/software/mod_injection/
And, last thing, the whole collection of mail of this
list, whereis it?
On
AddDescriptionMatch would be fine, but keep in mind the overhead of invoking
the pcre engine. Better opportunity for 2.1-dev is to ask all of these functions
to use the fnmatch() API for consistency.
Bill
At 07:18 AM 2/21/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
AddDescription has some unfortunate behavior in
The easiest example is mod_ext_filter which is nothing but a simple
pipe wrapper. It invokes the given pipe command and filters the content
through that pipe.
Bill
At 09:13 AM 2/21/2003, fabio rohrich wrote:
Hi.
We spoke long time about filtering in apache 1.3.
So far, I decided to write
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The easiest example is mod_ext_filter which is nothing but a simple
pipe wrapper. It invokes the given pipe command and filters the content
through that pipe.
So far, I decided to write mod_blanks as a filter for
apache 2.x, even if I
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] fabio rohrich wrote:
We spoke long time about filtering in apache 1.3.
So far, I decided to write mod_blanks as a filter for
apache 2.x, even if I wrote a large part for apache
Glad you saw the light. ;) It'll be much easier with 2.0.
Anyway,any
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:58:16AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Surely this can be done already outside APR?
Joe, what is it you really want to say :) I think we all know the
answer to that question already.
Just seems like classic creeping featurism to
Jeff Trawick wrote:
*not to share is a bit strong... our Apache2-based server is freely
available for download and the modifications made to pure Apache2+APR
are provided in a patch file that gets installed... but that isn't what
I usually mean by sharing code :)
do you have a link for
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
*not to share is a bit strong... our Apache2-based server is freely
available for download and the modifications made to pure Apache2+APR
are provided in a patch file that gets installed... but that isn't
what I usually mean by sharing code :)
do
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
AddDescriptionMatch would be fine, but keep in mind the overhead of
invoking
the pcre engine. Better opportunity for 2.1-dev is to ask all of
these functions
to use the fnmatch() API for consistency.
Overhead sucks, of course.
I just fear breaking config files
I'm having the same issue here
[ttyp0] [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD p6m7g8.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Feb 18 11:45:13 GMT
2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PHILIP i386
Thats a cvs checkout of httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util HEAD tags as of sometime
earlier
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:35 PM -0800 Aaron Bannert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'd rather see fewer core modules rather than more.
-0 for inclusion.
Personally, I'd support creating an httpd-auth subproject or
something like that which could house a bunch of (more, less?)
i can also confirm this behavior on my FreeBSD 5.0 box..
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:45:33 +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote
I'm having the same issue here
[ttyp0] [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD p6m7g8.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Feb 18
11:45:13 GMT 2003 [EMAIL
15 matches
Mail list logo
