At 06:19 PM 3/18/2003, André Malo wrote:
>* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>if (strcEQ(arg, "none") || strcEQ(arg, "no")) {
>>mc->nMutexMode = SSL_MUTEXMODE_NONE;
>>}
>> +/* NOTE: previously, 'yes' implied 'sem' */
>> +else if (strcEQ(arg, "default") || strcEQ(
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 04:45:09PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Friday, March 14, 2003 12:50 AM -0800 Jim Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Howdy,
> >I have a question in the same vein as my last post. Can I rely on
> > ap_get_brigade(mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, len=X) to retu
--On Friday, March 14, 2003 12:50 AM -0800 Jim Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Howdy,
I have a question in the same vein as my last post. Can I rely on
ap_get_brigade(mode=AP_MODE_READBYTES, len=X) to return a brigade of length
no greater than X? It would appear not, which means I need to
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>if (strcEQ(arg, "none") || strcEQ(arg, "no")) {
>mc->nMutexMode = SSL_MUTEXMODE_NONE;
>}
> +/* NOTE: previously, 'yes' implied 'sem' */
> +else if (strcEQ(arg, "default") || strcEQ(arg, "yes")) {
> +mc->nMutexMode = SS
Ian Holsman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
I have 'data' datas long 'lenght'. If I try to modify
the data I get and to send it again inside the bucket,
it doesnt work.
What kind of buckets do you have before you try to modify them? You
ca
... but is now back on 2.0.44. This was HEAD from yesterday with the patch Joe
Orton re-submitted to prevent CGIs from inheriting the log fds. That one seems
important enough to stress for a while in a production environment.
Unfortunately, I noticed a number of errors with bugs.apache.org and
Colm =?unknown-8bit?Q?MacC=E1rthaigh?= wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:28:52PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'm considering releasing 1.3.28 soonish... comments?
>
>Here's a patch that makes Include config directives work recursively,
>posted it months ago, but I never chased it up :/
>
>Month
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 12:55:52PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> This patch was committed to 1.3.28-dev about 4 months ago (gee, has it
> really been 4+ months since a 1.3. release?)
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c.diff?r1=1.128&r2=1.129
Thank you. I never thoug
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> At 11:55 AM 3/18/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >This patch was committed to 1.3.28-dev about 4 months ago (gee, has it really been
> >4+ months since a 1.3. release?)
>
> I think Jim pointed out that it would be good to get a 1.3.28 release
> done, but I don't know
At 11:55 AM 3/18/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>This patch was committed to 1.3.28-dev about 4 months ago (gee, has it really been 4+
>months since a 1.3. release?)
I think Jim pointed out that it would be good to get a 1.3.28 release
done, but I don't know if anyone has stepped up to RM (no, I'm no
This patch was committed to 1.3.28-dev about 4 months ago (gee, has it
really been 4+ months since a 1.3. release?)
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c.diff?r1=1.128&r2=1.129
Bill
Hello,
For a while I have been noticing performance problems with CGI scripts
running under Apache (1.3.27) and Solaris (2.8). These are "normal" forked
CGI scripts: not FastCGI, mod_perl etc.
The symptom is that very often there is a three-second delay between
requesting the page and getting the
Stas Bekman wrote:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
I have 'data' datas long 'lenght'. If I try to modify
the data I get and to send it again inside the bucket,
it doesnt work.
What kind of buckets do you have before you try to modify them? You
can't modify some type
At 03:25 AM 3/18/2003, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:56:11PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
>> We don't have the mechanics in place so right now this is a beneficial
>> noop on Win32. However, we should be passing those handles on to
>> all child processes. That won't happen today, but
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:56:11PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> At 04:46 AM 3/13/2003, Joe Orton wrote:
> >[Resend. There are currently two outstanding fixes for public security
> >issues in the 2.0 stable branch: this and escaping of untrusted request
> >data in mod_log_config which Andre forward
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Greg Ames wrote:
I have 'data' datas long 'lenght'. If I try to modify
the data I get and to send it again inside the bucket,
it doesnt work.
What kind of buckets do you have before you try to modify them? You
can't modify some types of buckets.
You're
16 matches
Mail list logo
