RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance

2003-08-09 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: RE: [PATCH] mod_cache RFC compliance Hello Paul (or whoever can answer me... ;-)), I just wanted to know why the patch you committed concerning mod_cache hasn't been introduced in Apache 2.0.47 ? Will it be in 2.0.48 ? And concerning the over mod_cache RFC violations, is there any new

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl ssl_engine_kernel.c

2003-08-09 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:05 AM > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:57:12PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >... > > +++ ssl_engine_kernel.c 7 Aug 2003 23:57:11 - 1.98 > > @@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ > >password = auth_line;

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/mappers mod_rewrite.c

2003-08-09 Thread André Malo
* Jeff Trawick wrote: >> +return "RewriteLog and RewriteLogLevel are not support by this >> incarnation " >> + "of mod_rewrite, because it was compiled using the " > > "are not supported by this build of mod_rewrite because..." I thought, I'd be funny :-) thanks, nd

Re: About time to do 2.0.48?

2003-08-09 Thread Greg Stein
+1 It'll be nice to have a release which isn't security related :-( On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:29:39AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting that feeling again that it is about time for > a new release. I am volunteering as RM (unless someone > else wants to do it). > > I envision

Re: About time to do 2.0.48?

2003-08-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Brad Nicholes wrote: > Do any of these funky bucket issues have anything to do with the > bucket_max_alloc() functionality that we have talked about in the past? > It would really be nice to be able to control the bucket allocations. That's not any of the three bugs I ment