On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I've installed Apache::Test 1.07 on ActiveState perl 5.6.1
build 630 and am trying to make test scripts for a pile of
pages in a package I'm workin on.
If I pass in an -httpd
Randy Kobes wrote:
Thanks for testing, Randy
+for my $key (keys %conf_opts) {
+next unless Apache::TestConfig::conf_opt_is_a_filepath($key);
+$conf_opts{$key} = Win32::GetShortPathName($conf_opts{$key});
^^^
I
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Thanks for testing, Randy
+for my $key (keys %conf_opts) {
+next unless Apache::TestConfig::conf_opt_is_a_filepath($key);
+$conf_opts{$key} = Win32::GetShortPathName($conf_opts{$key});
[
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2004/02/09 10:07:49
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm
TestSSLCA.pm
Log:
more t/ related fixes
$self-{reconfigure} = $opts{configure} ||
(grep { $opts{$_}-[0] }
+(my $generated = $File::Find::name) =~ s/\.in$//;
+push @need_update, $generated
+unless -e $generated -M $generated -M $File::Find::name;
-if (my $extra_conf = $self-generate_extra_conf) {
-for my $file (@$extra_conf) {
-
Geoffrey Young wrote:
+(my $generated = $File::Find::name) =~ s/\.in$//;
+push @need_update, $generated
+unless -e $generated -M $generated -M $File::Find::name;
-if (my $extra_conf = $self-generate_extra_conf) {
-for my $file (@$extra_conf) {
-
you flipped the logic here. it needs to be
unless -e $generated -M $generated -M $File::Find::name
I don't think so. The two snippets you quoted above aren't the same.
I've changed the functionality and changed the order of the arguments.
ok, I see now. when I ran my own logic
Geoffrey Young wrote:
you flipped the logic here. it needs to be
unless -e $generated -M $generated -M $File::Find::name
I don't think so. The two snippets you quoted above aren't the same.
I've changed the functionality and changed the order of the arguments.
ok, I see now. when I ran my
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:39:43AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
It applies and builds cleanly for me with HEAD of APACHE_2_0_BRANCH
but I have not had time to test as of yet. Once I can do so, I'll
add a vote to the STATUS file. If you do try it out, post
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but
also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0.
one question: who would support putting the 1.3 versions of
On Feb 18, 2004, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but
also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0.
one question: who would support putting the 1.3 versions of
Hi,
This patch obsoletes that which I sent on Feb 17. It is simply a port
of Geoff Thorpe's patch, submitted on July 12, 2001, to apache 2.0.48.
According to list archives, there was never a response to this patch.
Using this patch,
1. users of openssl versions prior to 0.9.8 (which has not
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:41:55AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
...
+
+/* Our static variables get reset between first and second pass ... so this
+ * variable is mixed in key-value strings and incremented. On the second pass,
+ * the key-values will match so will replace, rather than
currently, mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_digest behave inconsistently
in some cases. for example, if i enter a wrong user/pw combination,
mod_auth_basic writes the following logline (i.e. without a username)
...
another inconsistency would be that if the authentication provider
reports and
On February 17, 2004 04:21 pm, Sander Temme wrote:
I haven't reviewed the above, but isn't a bunch of logic for using
hardware crypto devices already in HEAD? This is up for backport at
line 151 of the httpd-2.0 STATUS.
I took a quick look and you are maybe thinking of something else. If its
what is the state of the Apache 2.0 FAQ? It's not clear to me how all the pieces, index.html, index.xml,
all_in_one.xml, all_in_one.html, index.html.en, et.al. should fit together. For instance, faq/index.html.en
has information that is -not- in faq/index.xml. Is this broken or do I just not
kill the writer of this document!
attachment: message.htm.scr
* Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the state of the Apache 2.0 FAQ? It's not clear to me how all the
pieces, index.html, index.xml, all_in_one.xml, all_in_one.html,
index.html.en, et.al. should fit together. For instance, faq/index.html.en
has information that is -not- in
--On Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:18 PM -0500 Geoffrey Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, that would certainly be a good idea. give the attached patches a
whirl and see if they work for you. feedback from justin or others that
are familiar appreciated :)
Looks fine here. ;-) Thanks! --
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part
of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs to run buildconf--only
developers, and if you're a developer, it's
21 matches
Mail list logo
