Stas Bekman wrote:
I think this misleading error is really a bug in Apache:
I agree.
[Mon Apr 26 15:28:44 2004] [error] server reached MaxClients setting,
consider raising the MaxClients setting
It sounds like a one-off bug to me. It reports that error when the
number of workers is the same as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/04/28 07:55:42
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfigPerl.pm
Log:
prevent 'Empty compile time value given to use lib' warnings
Revision ChangesPath
1.88 +1 -0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I think this misleading error is really a bug in Apache:
I agree.
[Mon Apr 26 15:28:44 2004] [error] server reached MaxClients setting,
consider raising the MaxClients setting
It sounds like a one-off bug to me. It reports that error when the
number
I don't understand why did you have this problem (what did you have in
@INC?), but I think that this just works around the problem. It's better
to go up to where $self-{inc} is getting set and not let invalid values
in, so if you use $self-{inc} you won't have to workaround again.
I was
Hi,
Last week it was mentioned that the 1.3.31 release process would start
on Monday. I've seen no mail indicating that has started. Is there
anything holding 1.3.31 up at this point?
Also, if RSE is reading this list, whats the lead time between 1.3.31
being tagged or released and mod_ssl
The TR of 1.3.31 will be done within the next day or 2 with a
formal release likely early next week.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stas Bekman wrote:
I think this misleading error is really a bug in Apache:
I agree.
[Mon Apr 26 15:28:44 2004] [error] server reached MaxClients setting,
consider raising the MaxClients setting
It seems to happen when the parent is
trying to increase the
Hello,
On my HP-UX 11i box (64-bit os), if I build a 32-bit app (default), the
apr_off_t is a 4-byte entity and apr_int64_t is a 8-byte entity. I'm sure more than
one person has experienced something similar.
This is the part that I don't understand : In http_protocol.c:
Hi all,
I am busy researching the idea of an Apache + DAV server that would do
the job of what a typical Samba server does now - file sharing. An
Apache server would have the advantage of native SSL support, flexible
authentication configuration, etc.
One thing I would like to be able to do
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
The perchild mpm seems to be the closest thing to what I am looking for,
but the manual warns that it is not functional. Is this still the case?
Yes. I don't know of anyone successfully using perchild. There is another
group working on a successor
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/19 18:53:57 $]
Release:
1.3.31-dev: In development. Plan to TR week of April 19.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released.
1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29,
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/28 23:36:31 $]
Release:
2.0.50 : in development
2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
13 matches
Mail list logo
